Paper · 1997 · Biologia Plantarum

Influence of altered irradiance on fruits and leaves of mature pear trees

P.I. Garriz; H.L. Alvarez; A.J. Alvarez

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The response of pear fruit and leaf parameters to shade imposed during development was studied. Whole branches of mature trees of Pyrus communis L. cv. Bartlett growing in the High Valley area of Argentina were covered with a shade cloth (80 % reduction in irradiance) from 6 to 18 weeks after full bloom (WAFB) during the 1995-96 growing season. Fruit diameter was measured at two-weekly intervals; flesh firmness, soluble solids concentration, and leaf area were determined 18 WAFB. Prolonged shading significantly reduced fruiting spur specific leaf mass and consequently resulted in 20.79 % less final fruit fresh mass. However, flesh firmness was 8.07 % lower under full irradiance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolonged shading significantly reduced fruiting spur specific leaf mass in pear.

Taxon
Pyrus communisPyrus communise0
Material
cv. Bartlette0
Treatment
Prolonged shadinge1
Outcome
fruiting spur specific leaf masse1
Direction
reducede1
Setting
High Valley area of Argentinae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole branches of mature trees of Pyrus communis L. cv. Bartlett growing in the High Valley area of Argentina were covered with a shade cloth (80 % reduction in irradiance)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–268 · show in text ↑
e1

“Prolonged shading significantly reduced fruiting spur specific leaf mass and consequently resulted in 20.79 % less final fruit fresh mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolonged shading resulted in 20.79% less final fruit fresh mass in pear.

Taxon
Pyrus communisPyrus communise0
Material
cv. Bartlette0
Treatment
Prolonged shadinge1
Outcome
final fruit fresh masse1
Direction
lesse1
Value
20.79 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole branches of mature trees of Pyrus communis L. cv. Bartlett growing in the High Valley area of Argentina were covered with a shade cloth (80 % reduction in irradiance)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–268 · show in text ↑
e1

“Prolonged shading significantly reduced fruiting spur specific leaf mass and consequently resulted in 20.79 % less final fruit fresh mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–622 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pear flesh firmness was 8.07% lower under full irradiance.

Taxon
Pyrus communisPyrus communise0
Outcome
flesh firmnesse3
Direction
lowere3
Value
8.07%e3
Setting
under full irradiancee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole branches of mature trees of Pyrus communis L. cv. Bartlett growing in the High Valley area of Argentina were covered with a shade cloth (80 % reduction in irradiance)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–268 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, flesh firmness was 8.07% lower under full irradiance”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 624–686 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.