Abstract
A field experiment was carried out at Students instructional farm of the Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad (W) during winter season (rabi) 2001-2002. Application of fluchloralin, pendimethalin, metolachlor each @ 1.0,1.5 and 2.0 kg/ha did not affect the germination (%) in chickpea. In general various characters, viz branchestplant, dry weight1 plant and number of nodules and their dry weighttplant were affected significantly at all the doses (1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 kg/ha) of herbicides tested. FPuchloralin applied at 1.0 kg/ha gave growth promotary effect and significantly increased branched plant, dry weighttplant, nodules/plant and dry weight of the nodules. All these herbicides applied at 1.5 kglha or 2.0 kg/ ha produced inhibitory effect an number of branchestplant, dry weightiplant and number of nodules, their dry weight1 piant and reduced these growth parameters either significantly or produced the results at par with untreated check. All of these herbicides reduced leaf arealplant at all the doses except fluchloralin which produced growth promoting effect on leaf area at the dose of 1.0 kg/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Fluchloralin, pendimethalin and metolachlor at 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 kg/ha did not affect chickpea germination.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- fluchloralin, pendimethalin, metolachlor each @ 1.0,1.5 and 2.0 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- germination (%)e0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of fluchloralin, pendimethalin, metolachlor each @ 1.0,1.5 and 2.0 kg/ha did not affect the germination (%) in chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Branches per plant, plant dry weight, number of nodules and nodule dry weight were significantly affected at all herbicide doses of 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- herbicidese1
- Outcome
- branchestplant, dry weight1 plant and number of nodules and their dry weighttplante1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e1“various characters, viz branchestplant, dry weight1 plant and number of nodules and their dry weighttplant were affected significantly at all the doses (1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 kg/ha) of herbicides tested”
Claim · model-written summary
Fluchloralin at 1.0 kg/ha had a growth promoting effect and significantly increased branches per plant and plant dry weight in chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- FPuchloralin applied at 1.0 kg/hae1
- Outcome
- branched plant, dry weighttplante1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e1“FPuchloralin applied at 1.0 kg/ha gave growth promotary effect and significantly increased branched plant, dry weighttplant”
Claim · model-written summary
Fluchloralin at 1.0 kg/ha significantly increased the number of nodules per plant and nodule dry weight in chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- FPuchloralin applied at 1.0 kg/hae1
- Outcome
- nodules/plant and dry weight of the nodulese2
- Direction
- increasede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e1“FPuchloralin applied at 1.0 kg/ha”
e2“significantly increased branched plant, dry weighttplant, nodules/plant and dry weight of the nodules”
Claim · model-written summary
The herbicides at 1.5 or 2.0 kg/ha had an inhibitory effect on branches per plant and plant dry weight in chickpea, reducing them significantly or to levels at par with the untreated check.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- herbicides applied at 1.5 kglha or 2.0 kg/ hae1
- Outcome
- number of branchestplant, dry weightiplante1
- Direction
- inhibitory effecte1
- Comparator
- untreated checke2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e1“All these herbicides applied at 1.5 kglha or 2.0 kg/ ha produced inhibitory effect an number of branchestplant, dry weightiplant”
e2“untreated check”
Claim · model-written summary
The herbicides at 1.5 or 2.0 kg/ha had an inhibitory effect on number of nodules and nodule dry weight in chickpea, reducing them significantly or to levels at par with the untreated check.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- herbicides applied at 1.5 kglha or 2.0 kg/ hae1
- Outcome
- number of nodules, their dry weight1 piante1
- Direction
- inhibitory effecte1
- Comparator
- untreated checke2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e1“All these herbicides applied at 1.5 kglha or 2.0 kg/ ha produced inhibitory effect an number of branchestplant, dry weightiplant and number of nodules, their dry weight1 piant”
e2“untreated check”
Claim · model-written summary
All the herbicides reduced leaf area per plant in chickpea at all doses.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- herbicidese1
- Outcome
- leaf arealplante1
- Direction
- reducede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e1“All of these herbicides reduced leaf arealplant at all the doses”
Claim · model-written summary
Fluchloralin at 1.0 kg/ha produced a growth promoting effect on chickpea leaf area.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- fluchloraline1
- Outcome
- leaf areae1
- Direction
- growth promoting effecte1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e1“fluchloralin which produced growth promoting effect on leaf area at the dose of 1.0 kg/ha”
The same questions in other papers
pendimethalin · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Fluchloralin · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
herbicide · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.