Paper · 2010 · Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)

A TWO YEAR AGRONOMIC EVALUATION OF CAMELINA SATIVA AND BRASSICA CARINATA IN NS, PEI AND SK

X. Pan

13
claims
17
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study assessed oilseed crops Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz and Brassica carinata A. Braun in NS, PEI and SK. Evaluations of basic agronomy were performed to determine optimum management practices. The C. sativa genotype CN30479 performed best; all 10 B. carinata accessions had satisfactory performance. 125 kg N/ha in NS and PEI and 100 kg N/ha in SK gave maximum C. sativa seed yield while optimum plant density was 170, 280 and 150 plants/m2 in NS, PEI and SK, respectively. Brassica carinata required 125 kg N/ha in NS and PEI, and 75 kg N/ha in SK for optimum seed yield. 200 seeds/m2 (80 plants/m2) was the optimum seeding rate for B. carinata in all sites. Controlled environment studies showed that seed yield response to N depended on the water regime. C. sativa and B. carinata have good agronomic suitability across Canada.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Camelina genotype CN30479 performed best.

Taxon
C. sativaCamelina sativae0
Material
CN30479e0
Outcome
performed beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The C. sativa genotype CN30479 performed best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–245 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All ten Brassica carinata accessions had satisfactory performance.

Taxon
B. carinataBrassica carinatae0
Outcome
satisfactory performancee0
Qualifier
all 10 B. carinata accessionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all 10 B. carinata accessions had satisfactory performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Camelina seed yield was maximized with 125 kg N/ha in NS and PEI.

Taxon
C. sativaCamelina sativae0
Treatment
125 kg N/hae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
NS and PEIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“125 kg N/ha in NS and PEI and 100 kg N/ha in SK gave maximum C. sativa seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Camelina seed yield was maximized with 100 kg N/ha in SK.

Taxon
C. sativaCamelina sativae0
Treatment
100 kg N/hae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
SKe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“125 kg N/ha in NS and PEI and 100 kg N/ha in SK gave maximum C. sativa seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–388 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum Camelina density in NS was 170 plants/m2.

Taxon
CAMELINA SATIVACamelina sativat0
Outcome
optimum plant densitye0
Value
170, 280 and 150 plants/m2e0
Setting
NSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimum plant density was 170, 280 and 150 plants/m2 in NS, PEI and SK, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAMELINA SATIVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum Camelina density in PEI was 280 plants/m2.

Taxon
CAMELINA SATIVACamelina sativat0
Outcome
optimum plant densitye0
Value
170, 280 and 150 plants/m2e0
Setting
PEIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimum plant density was 170, 280 and 150 plants/m2 in NS, PEI and SK, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAMELINA SATIVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum Camelina density in SK was 150 plants/m2.

Taxon
CAMELINA SATIVACamelina sativat0
Outcome
optimum plant densitye0
Value
170, 280 and 150 plants/m2e0
Setting
SKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimum plant density was 170, 280 and 150 plants/m2 in NS, PEI and SK, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAMELINA SATIVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brassica carinata required 125 kg N/ha in NS and PEI for optimum seed yield.

Taxon
Brassica carinataBrassica carinatae0
Treatment
125 kg N/hae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
optimume0
Setting
NS and PEIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica carinata required 125 kg N/ha in NS and PEI, and 75 kg N/ha in SK for optimum seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brassica carinata required 75 kg N/ha in SK for optimum seed yield.

Taxon
Brassica carinataBrassica carinatae0
Treatment
75 kg N/hae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
optimume0
Setting
SKe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica carinata required 125 kg N/ha in NS and PEI, and 75 kg N/ha in SK for optimum seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–578 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum Brassica carinata seeding rate was 200 seeds/m2 at all sites.

Taxon
B. carinataBrassica carinatae0
Outcome
optimum seeding ratee0
Value
200 seeds/m2e0
Qualifier
in all sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“200 seeds/m2 (80 plants/m2) was the optimum seeding rate for B. carinata in all sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–665 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The associated optimum Brassica carinata density was 80 plants/m2.

Taxon
B. carinataBrassica carinatae0
Outcome
optimum seeding ratee0
Value
80 plants/m2e0
Qualifier
in all sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“200 seeds/m2 (80 plants/m2) was the optimum seeding rate for B. carinata in all sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–665 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield response to nitrogen depended on water regime.

Taxon
CAMELINA SATIVA AND BRASSICA CARINATAt0
Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
seed yield responsee0
Qualifier
water regimee0
Setting
Controlled environmente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Controlled environment studies showed that seed yield response to N depended on the water regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAMELINA SATIVA AND BRASSICA CARINATA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–72 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors judged both crops agronomically suitable across Canada.

Taxon
C. sativa and B. carinataBrassica carinataCamelina sativae0
Outcome
good agronomic suitabilitye0
Setting
Canadae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. sativa and B. carinata have good agronomic suitability across Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–836 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Brassica carinata (Ethiopian mustard)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Camelina sativa (false flax)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.