Abstract
The effects of drought stress and exogenous abscisic acid on the expression of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxyIase/oxygenase activase (Rubisco activase) were examined in wheat (Triticum aestivumL.). In response to water stress and abscisic acid, both the levels of endogenous abscisic acid and Rubiscoactivase increased in the leaves. Immunoblot analysis showed that both drought stress and abscisic acid,increased the amount of a 51KD activase form of the enzyme. In addition, our results from wheat leavesshowed that Rubisco activase up regulated under drought stress by increasing the amount of endogenousabscisic acid. Therefore the level of Rubisco activase was dependent on the abscisic acid level. These resultsare consistent with previous findings that Rubisco activase increases under high temperature stress. Theseresults indicate that the increased rate of activases synthesis may play a role in coping with the decline inphotosynthetic capacity under drought stress. Effects of drought stress and abscisic acid and their interactionwere highly significant (p<0.01) for all variables.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress and abscisic acid increased endogenous abscisic acid in wheat leaves.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Treatment
- water stress and abscisic acide0
- Outcome
- levels of endogenous abscisic acide0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In response to water stress and abscisic acid, both the levels of endogenous abscisic acid and Rubiscoactivase increased in the leaves.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress and abscisic acid increased Rubisco activase in wheat leaves.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Treatment
- water stress and abscisic acide0
- Outcome
- Rubiscoactivasee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In response to water stress and abscisic acid, both the levels of endogenous abscisic acid and Rubiscoactivase increased in the leaves.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought stress and abscisic acid increased the 51KD activase form.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- drought stress and abscisic acide0
- Outcome
- amount of a 51KD activase form of the enzymee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“both drought stress and abscisic acid,increased the amount of a 51KD activase form of the enzyme.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Rubisco activase level depended on abscisic acid level.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Compound
- abscisic acide0
- Outcome
- level of Rubisco activasee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Therefore the level of Rubisco activase was dependent on the abscisic acid level.”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
drought · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 204 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
242 papers more in this group
See all 246 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.