Abstract

Chitin was used as soil amendment in fiberglass field microplots, alone or with one or a combination of two to three species of Hirsutella rhossiliensis, Paecilomyces marquandii, Verticillium chlamydosporium, Bacillus thuringiensis, and Streptomyces costaricanus. Sudangrass and rapeseed were planted as cover crops and incorporated into soil as green manure amendments. Chitin amendment alone increased the marketable yield of lettuce in 1995 and reduced root-galling ratings and the reproduction of Meloidogyne hapla in both 1995 and 1996. Green manure amendments of sudangrass and rapeseed increased total and marketable yields of lettuce, and decreased root-galling ratings and the reproduction of M. hapla in 1996. Hirsutella rhossiliensis in combination with chitin increased total yield of lettuce over the chitin amendment alone in 1995. The combination of B. thuringiensis, S. costaricanus, and chitin either with or without P. marquandii increased total yield of lettuce over the chitin amendment alone in 1996. In most cases, however, the nematode-antagonistic organisms did not improve lettuce yield or further suppression of M. hapla compared to the chitin amendment alone. The introduced fungi were recoverable from the infested soil. The rifampicin-resistant mutant of B. thuringiensis was not isolated at the end of the season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitin alone increased marketable lettuce yield in 1995.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Chitin amendmente0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
1995e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitin amendment alone increased the marketable yield of lettuce in 1995”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitin alone reduced lettuce root-galling in 1995 and 1996.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Chitin amendmente0
Interactor
Meloidogyne haplaMeloidogyne haplae0pathogen
Outcome
root-galling ratingse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
both 1995 and 1996e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitin amendment alone increased the marketable yield of lettuce in 1995 and reduced root-galling ratings and the reproduction of Meloidogyne hapla in both 1995 and 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitin alone reduced M. hapla reproduction in 1995 and 1996.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Chitint0
Interactor
Meloidogyne haplaMeloidogyne haplae0pathogen
Outcome
reproduction of Meloidogyne haplae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced root-galling ratings and the reproduction of Meloidogyne hapla in both 1995 and 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Suppression of Meloidogyne hapla and Its Damage to Lettuce Grown in a Mineral Soil Amended with Chitin and Biocontrol Organisms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sudangrass green manure increased total lettuce yield in 1996.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
sudangrasse0
Outcome
totale0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manure amendments of sudangrass and rapeseed increased total and marketable yields of lettuce, and decreased root-galling ratings and the reproduction of M. hapla in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapeseed green manure increased total lettuce yield in 1996.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
rapeseede0
Outcome
totale0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manure amendments of sudangrass and rapeseed increased total and marketable yields of lettuce, and decreased root-galling ratings and the reproduction of M. hapla in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sudangrass green manure increased marketable lettuce yield in 1996.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
sudangrasse0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manure amendments of sudangrass and rapeseed increased total and marketable yields of lettuce, and decreased root-galling ratings and the reproduction of M. hapla in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapeseed green manure increased marketable lettuce yield in 1996.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
rapeseede0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manure amendments of sudangrass and rapeseed increased total and marketable yields of lettuce, and decreased root-galling ratings and the reproduction of M. hapla in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sudangrass green manure reduced lettuce root galling in 1996.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
sudangrasse0
Interactor
M. haplaMeloidogyne haplae0pathogen
Outcome
root-galling ratingse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manure amendments of sudangrass and rapeseed increased total and marketable yields of lettuce, and decreased root-galling ratings and the reproduction of M. hapla in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapeseed green manure reduced lettuce root galling in 1996.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
rapeseede0
Interactor
M. haplaMeloidogyne haplae0pathogen
Outcome
root-galling ratingse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manure amendments of sudangrass and rapeseed increased total and marketable yields of lettuce, and decreased root-galling ratings and the reproduction of M. hapla in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sudangrass green manure reduced M. hapla reproduction in 1996.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
sudangrasse0
Interactor
M. haplaMeloidogyne haplae0pathogen
Outcome
reproduction of M. haplae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manure amendments of sudangrass and rapeseed increased total and marketable yields of lettuce, and decreased root-galling ratings and the reproduction of M. hapla in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapeseed green manure reduced M. hapla reproduction in 1996.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
rapeseede0
Interactor
M. haplaMeloidogyne haplae0pathogen
Outcome
reproduction of M. haplae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manure amendments of sudangrass and rapeseed increased total and marketable yields of lettuce, and decreased root-galling ratings and the reproduction of M. hapla in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hirsutella rhossiliensis plus chitin increased total lettuce yield above chitin alone in 1995.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Hirsutella rhossiliensis in combination with chitine0
Interactor
Hirsutella rhossiliensisHirsutella rhossiliensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
chitin amendment alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hirsutella rhossiliensis in combination with chitin increased total yield of lettuce over the chitin amendment alone in 1995”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. thuringiensis, S. costaricanus and chitin increased total lettuce yield over chitin alone in 1996.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
B. thuringiensis, S. costaricanus, and chitine0
Interactor
B. thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
S. costaricanusStreptomyces murinuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
either with or without P. marquandiie0
Comparator
chitin amendment alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of B. thuringiensis, S. costaricanus, and chitin either with or without P. marquandii increased total yield of lettuce over the chitin amendment alone in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding nematode antagonists usually did not improve lettuce yield over chitin alone.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
nematode-antagonistic organismse0
Outcome
lettuce yielde0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
chitin amendment alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In most cases, however, the nematode-antagonistic organisms did not improve lettuce yield or further suppression of M. hapla compared to the chitin amendment alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding nematode antagonists usually did not further suppress M. hapla over chitin alone.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
nematode-antagonistic organismse0
Interactor
M. haplaMeloidogyne haplae0pathogen
Outcome
suppression of M. haplae0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
chitin amendment alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In most cases, however, the nematode-antagonistic organisms did not improve lettuce yield or further suppression of M. hapla compared to the chitin amendment alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1185 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introduced fungi were recoverable from infested soil.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Interactor
introduced fungie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
introduced fungi were recoverablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The introduced fungi were recoverable from the infested soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Suppression of Meloidogyne hapla and Its Damage to Lettuce Grown in a Mineral Soil Amended with Chitin and Biocontrol Organisms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rifampicin-resistant B. thuringiensis mutant was not isolated at season end.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Interactor
B. thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
was not isolated at the end of the seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rifampicin-resistant mutant of B. thuringiensis was not isolated at the end of the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Suppression of Meloidogyne hapla and Its Damage to Lettuce Grown in a Mineral Soil Amended with Chitin and Biocontrol Organisms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑

Sorghum x drummondii · Meloidogyne hapla · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus thuringiensis · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

resistance inducer · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

other · quality: postharvest · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

resistance inducer · Meloidogyne hapla · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.