Paper · 2021 · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)

Orchard Floor Management

Rowley, Marc A.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Orchard floor management is vital to tree health, yield, and fruit quality. Current standard management practices include maintaining a vegetation-free tree row and a grass-covered alleyway. This system is effective at limiting competition from undesirable vegetation and creating a favorable environment for the fruit trees. However, limitations to standard orchard floor practices are that the grass alleyway provides no nutrient benefit, and current practices do not readily lend themselves to organic management constraints. Alternative in-row and alleyway systems are requisite to creating improved orchard floor management systems. Three different approaches were used to investigate alternative orchard floor management strategies, including: alternative in-row weed control with combinations of mulch and organic herbicides, alternative alleyway management with legume cover crops, and combinations of in-row and alleyway alternative strategies. Although organic in-row weed control was best accomplished with combinations of straw and acetic acid, this management approach was not economically viable at current costs of labor and supplies, and current fruit prices. Alfalfa and alfalfa clover treatments contributed the most aboveground biomass and nitrogen among alternative alleyway covers, but consumed 45% more water than the conventional grass alleyway. In combinations of in-row and alleyway alternatives, birds-foot trefoil alleyway had a beneficial effect on tree growth compared to grass, while consuming the greatest amount of water. Peach yields were the highest for the integrated compost and NPK fertility treatments that used herbicides to minimize competition. Treatments that experienced the most competition from weeds, no herbicide and reduced herbicide treatments, resulted in lower yields. Weed fabric and tillage in-row weed control methods resulted in the highest tree growth as compared to the straw and alyssum treatments. Finally, results from the combined studies were integrated into a series of recommendations for commercial fruit growers. While alternatives to orchard floor management show a number of potential benefits for growers in the Intermountain West, additional work is needed to determine the long-term viability of these approaches.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw and acetic acid combinations gave the best organic in-row weed control.

Taxon
fruit treese1
Treatment
combinations of straw and acetic acide0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Orchard Floor Management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“organic in-row weed control was best accomplished with combinations of straw and acetic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“This system is effective at limiting competition from undesirable vegetation and creating a favorable environment for the fruit trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–325 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw and acetic acid weed control was not economically viable at current costs and fruit prices.

Taxon
fruit treese1
Outcome
not economically viablee0
Qualifier
current costs of labor and supplies, and current fruit pricese0

Verbatim

t0

“Orchard Floor Management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“this management approach was not economically viable at current costs of labor and supplies, and current fruit prices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1175 · show in text ↑
e1

“This system is effective at limiting competition from undesirable vegetation and creating a favorable environment for the fruit trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa and alfalfa clover produced the most aboveground biomass and nitrogen among alleyway covers.

Taxon
fruit treese1
Treatment
Alfalfa and alfalfa clover treatmentse0
Outcome
aboveground biomass and nitrogene0
Direction
moste0
Comparator
alternative alleyway coverse0

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa and alfalfa clover treatments contributed the most aboveground biomass and nitrogen among alternative alleyway covers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1301 · show in text ↑
e1

“This system is effective at limiting competition from undesirable vegetation and creating a favorable environment for the fruit trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa and alfalfa clover alleyways consumed 45% more water than grass.

Taxon
fruit treese1
Treatment
Alfalfa and alfalfa clover treatmentse0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
moree0
Value
45%e0
Comparator
conventional grass alleywaye0

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa and alfalfa clover treatments contributed the most aboveground biomass and nitrogen among alternative alleyway covers, but consumed 45% more water than the conventional grass alleyway.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1368 · show in text ↑
e1

“This system is effective at limiting competition from undesirable vegetation and creating a favorable environment for the fruit trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Birds-foot trefoil alleyway improved tree growth compared with grass.

Taxon
fruit treese1
Treatment
birds-foot trefoil alleywaye0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
beneficial effecte0
Comparator
grasse0

Verbatim

e0

“birds-foot trefoil alleyway had a beneficial effect on tree growth compared to grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1506 · show in text ↑
e1

“This system is effective at limiting competition from undesirable vegetation and creating a favorable environment for the fruit trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–325 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Birds-foot trefoil consumed the greatest amount of water.

Taxon
fruit treese1
Treatment
birds-foot trefoil alleywaye0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
greateste0

Verbatim

e0

“birds-foot trefoil alleyway had a beneficial effect on tree growth compared to grass, while consuming the greatest amount of water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1553 · show in text ↑
e1

“This system is effective at limiting competition from undesirable vegetation and creating a favorable environment for the fruit trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated compost and NPK fertility with herbicides gave the highest peach yields.

Treatment
integrated compost and NPK fertility treatments that used herbicidese0
Outcome
Peach yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peach yields were the highest for the integrated compost and NPK fertility treatments that used herbicides to minimize competition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No and reduced herbicide treatments with the most weed competition had lower yields.

Treatment
no herbicide and reduced herbicide treatmentse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments that experienced the most competition from weeds, no herbicide and reduced herbicide treatments, resulted in lower yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1819 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach yields were the highest for the integrated compost and NPK fertility treatments that used herbicides to minimize competition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed fabric and tillage gave the highest tree growth versus straw and alyssum.

Taxon
fruit treese1
Treatment
Weed fabric and tillage in-row weed control methodse0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
straw and alyssum treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Weed fabric and tillage in-row weed control methods resulted in the highest tree growth as compared to the straw and alyssum treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–1956 · show in text ↑
e1

“This system is effective at limiting competition from undesirable vegetation and creating a favorable environment for the fruit trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–325 · show in text ↑

Medicago sativa · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

59 papers: 50 positive, 9 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

tillage · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.