Paper · 2015 · Biological Forum

Effect of hydro-priming and hormonal priming on germination traits of chickpea cultivars

N. Laal; Tooraj Mir-Mahmoodi; Nabi Khaliliaqdam

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Priming of seeds in osmoticums such as ascorbic acid, salicylic acid and in water is a simple and safe technique for enhancing seed germination. Therefore, the laboratory assay was conducted in seed Laboratory of Islamic Azad University of Sanandaj. The experiment was conducted as a factorial design based on completely randomized design with three replications. Factor A included six priming treatments of: 50 ppm Salicylic acid (SA) , 100 ppm SA, 50 ppm Ascorbic acid (AsA), 100 ppm AsA, hydro-priming and control (no priming) and factor B included the four chickpea cultivars (Kaka, Jam, Piruz and ILC462). Results showed that the maximum rate of shoot length, root length, shoot and root dry weight and shoot and root fresh weight in all chickpea cultivars was recorded by 100 AsA priming treatment. Application of higher dose (100 ppm) of SA and AsA resulted in the highest rate of germination in all chickpea cultivars. Germination percentage was significantly increased in all priming treatments in comparison with no priming or control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 ppm AsA priming gave the maximum rate of shoot length and root length in all chickpea cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100 AsA priminge2
Outcome
shoot length, root lengthe2
Direction
maximume2
Setting
laboratory assaye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“the laboratory assay was conducted in seed Laboratory of Islamic Azad University of Sanandaj”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–248 · show in text ↑
e2

“the maximum rate of shoot length, root length, shoot and root dry weight and shoot and root fresh weight in all chickpea cultivars was recorded by 100 AsA priming treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 ppm AsA priming gave the maximum rate of shoot and root dry weight in all chickpea cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100 AsA priminge2
Outcome
shoot and root dry weighte2
Direction
maximume2
Setting
laboratory assaye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“the laboratory assay was conducted in seed Laboratory of Islamic Azad University of Sanandaj”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–248 · show in text ↑
e2

“the maximum rate of shoot length, root length, shoot and root dry weight and shoot and root fresh weight in all chickpea cultivars was recorded by 100 AsA priming treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 ppm AsA priming gave the maximum rate of shoot and root fresh weight in all chickpea cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100 AsA priminge2
Outcome
shoot and root fresh weighte2
Direction
maximume2
Setting
laboratory assaye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“the laboratory assay was conducted in seed Laboratory of Islamic Azad University of Sanandaj”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–248 · show in text ↑
e2

“the maximum rate of shoot length, root length, shoot and root dry weight and shoot and root fresh weight in all chickpea cultivars was recorded by 100 AsA priming treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 ppm SA priming gave the highest rate of germination in chickpea cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
higher dose (100 ppm) of SAe3
Outcome
rate of germinatione3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of higher dose (100 ppm) of SA and AsA resulted in the highest rate of germination in all chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 ppm AsA priming gave the highest rate of germination in chickpea cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
higher dose (100 ppm) of SA and AsAe3
Outcome
rate of germinatione3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of higher dose (100 ppm) of SA and AsA resulted in the highest rate of germination in all chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming treatments significantly increased germination percentage in chickpea cultivars compared with no priming or control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
all priming treatmentse4
Outcome
Germination percentagee4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
no priming or controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 · show in text ↑
e4

“Germination percentage was significantly increased in all priming treatments in comparison with no priming or control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1044 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

L-ascorbic acid · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

81 papers: 76 positive, 5 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.