Paper · 2014 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Productivity and quality of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) as influenced by planting geometry and nitrogen levels under irrigated and rainfed conditions

P R DADGALE; D A CHAVAN; B A GUDADE; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during two consecutive kharif seasons of 2009 and 2010 at research farm of Department of Agronomy, Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani to evaluate the effect of planting geometry and different nitrogen levels on productivity and quality of Bt-cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under irrigated and rainfed conditions. The results reveals that, Bt cotton sown under irrigated condition (irrigation applied at three critical growth stages of cotton) significantly improved the seed cotton yield (33.71 q/ha) over rainfed condition (15.00 q/ ha). The growth attributes, yield contributing characters and ginning percentage were improved significantly in irrigation as compared to rainfed during both the seasons of experiment. The plant geometry of 120 cm × 45 cm recorded highest seed cotton yield (26.46 q/ha) and stood significantly superior over other planting geometries. It has 8.9 and 13.5% yield increment over 90 cm × 60 cm and 180 cm × 30 cm, respectively. All growth and yield contributing parameters were recorded significantly higher with 120 cm × 45 cm plant geometry as compared to other planting geometries, except plant height (cm), monopodials/plant, leaf area (dm2) and dry matter accumulation (g/plant). Application of nitrogen @ 150 kg N/ha to Bt cotton increases 25.5% and 8.6% seed cotton yield over 100 kg N/ha and 125 kg N/ha, respectively. Quality parameters did not influence significantly by irrigation, planting geometries and nitrogen levels confirms that fibre properties governs by genetic makeup and least affected by management practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly increased seed-cotton yield over rainfed production.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
irrigated conditione0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
33.71 q/hae0
Qualifier
15.00 q/ hae0
Comparator
rainfed conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Bt cotton sown under irrigated condition (irrigation applied at three critical growth stages of cotton) significantly improved the seed cotton yield (33.71 q/ha) over rainfed condition (15.00 q/ ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly improved growth attributes, yield components and ginning percentage.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
growth attributes, yield contributing characters and ginning percentagee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
rainfede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The growth attributes, yield contributing characters and ginning percentage were improved significantly in irrigation as compared to rainfed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 120 cm × 45 cm produced the highest seed-cotton yield.

Treatment
120 cm × 45 cme0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
26.46 q/hae0
Comparator
other planting geometriese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The plant geometry of 120 cm × 45 cm recorded highest seed cotton yield (26.46 q/ha) and stood significantly superior over other planting geometries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 120 cm × 45 cm spacing increased yield 8.9% over 90 cm × 60 cm.

Outcome
yield incremente0
Direction
incremente0
Value
8.9e0
Comparator
90 cm × 60 cme0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“It has 8.9 and 13.5% yield increment over 90 cm × 60 cm and 180 cm × 30 cm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 120 cm × 45 cm spacing increased yield 13.5% over 180 cm × 30 cm.

Outcome
yield incremente0
Direction
incremente0
Value
13.5%e0
Comparator
180 cm × 30 cme0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“It has 8.9 and 13.5% yield increment over 90 cm × 60 cm and 180 cm × 30 cm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most growth and yield components were higher at 120 cm × 45 cm spacing than at other spacings.

Treatment
120 cm × 45 cm plant geometrye0
Outcome
growth and yield contributing parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
except plant height (cm), monopodials/plant, leaf area (dm2) and dry matter accumulation (g/plant)e0
Comparator
other planting geometriese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“All growth and yield contributing parameters were recorded significantly higher with 120 cm × 45 cm plant geometry as compared to other planting geometries, except plant height (cm), monopodials/plant, leaf area (dm2) and dry matter accumulation (g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 150 kg N/ha increased yield 25.5% over 100 kg N/ha.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
nitrogen @ 150 kg N/hae0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
25.5%e0
Comparator
100 kg N/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nitrogen @ 150 kg N/ha to Bt cotton increases 25.5% and 8.6% seed cotton yield over 100 kg N/ha and 125 kg N/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 150 kg N/ha increased yield 8.6% over 125 kg N/ha.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
nitrogen @ 150 kg N/hae0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
8.6%e0
Comparator
125 kg N/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nitrogen @ 150 kg N/ha to Bt cotton increases 25.5% and 8.6% seed cotton yield over 100 kg N/ha and 125 kg N/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation, spacing and nitrogen rate did not significantly influence cotton quality parameters.

Treatment
irrigation, planting geometries and nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
Quality parameterse0
Direction
did not influence significantlye0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Quality parameters did not influence significantly by irrigation, planting geometries and nitrogen levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.