Paper · 2004 · Acta Agraria Debreceniensis

Effect of Ozone Exposure on Phytopathogenic Microorganisms on Stored Apples

Carmen Puia; Ioan Oroian; Veronica Florian

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
10
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of our study was to clarify the effect of ozone exposure on several phytopathogenic fungi on stored apple fruits under different storage conditions. The study was conducted at Bistrita, Romania, in the storehouse of an experimental apple orchard in 2002 and 2003. Two widely grown apple cultivars (‘Jonathan’ and ‘Golden Delicious’) were used. General microbial examination of the fruits was made during storage in order to identify the most important storage pathogens. Efficacy of six ozone treatments was evaluted on fruit decay caused by phytopathogenic fungi. Monthly observations (January, February, March and April) were made of the degree of decay and three measurements were assessed (disease frequency, disease intensity and degree of attack). Our results showed that the most important phytopathogenic fungi during storage was blue mold, caused by species of Penicillium. Disease frequency of apple fruits was very high on cv. ‘Jonathan’, much higher than on cv. ‘Golden delicious’. Ozone treatments (25 ppm ozone for 0.5 and 1.5 hours in November) caused significantly lower disease incidence on stored apple than all other ozone treatments. For longer storage, it seems that additional ozone treatments in February increased treatment efficacy. Cv. ‘Golden delicious’ seemed to be more resistant to storage diseases than cv. ‘Jonathan’ both on the untreated and treated fruits. The effect of the ozone treatments was also the most effective when 25 ppm ozone was applied for 0.5 and 1.5 hours in November.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue mold caused by Penicillium species was the most important storage disease of apple fruits.

Interactor
PenicilliumPenicilliume0pathogen
Outcome
the most important phytopathogenic fungi during storage was blue molde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium
Penicillium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMilo Manica · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most important phytopathogenic fungi during storage was blue mold, caused by species of Penicillium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stored Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease frequency was very high on Jonathan apples, much higher than on Golden Delicious.

Material
Jonathane0
Outcome
Disease frequencye0
Direction
much highere0
Comparator
Golden deliciouse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease frequency of apple fruits was very high on cv. ‘Jonathan’, much higher than on cv. ‘Golden delicious’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone treatments of 25 ppm for 0.5 and 1.5 hours in November gave significantly lower disease incidence on stored apple than all other ozone treatments.

Treatment
25 ppm ozone for 0.5 and 1.5 hours in Novembere0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
all other ozone treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ozone treatments (25 ppm ozone for 0.5 and 1.5 hours in November) caused significantly lower disease incidence on stored apple than all other ozone treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For longer storage, additional ozone treatments in February seemed to increase treatment efficacy.

Treatment
additional ozone treatments in Februarye0
Outcome
treatment efficacye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For longer storage, it seems that additional ozone treatments in February increased treatment efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stored Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–75 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Golden Delicious seemed more resistant to storage diseases than Jonathan, on both untreated and treated fruits.

Material
Golden deliciouse0
Outcome
more resistant to storage diseasese0
Direction
more resistante0
Comparator
Jonathane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cv. ‘Golden delicious’ seemed to be more resistant to storage diseases than cv. ‘Jonathan’ both on the untreated and treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stored Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–75 · show in text ↑

ozone · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.