Paper · 2006 · PubMed

Tillage and residue burning affects weed populations and seed banks.

S Narwal; B M Sindel; R S Jessop

14
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An integrated weed management approach requires alternative management practices to herbicide use such as tillage, crop rotations and cultural controls to reduce soil weed seed banks. The objective of this study was to examine the value of different tillage practices and stubble burning to exhaust the seed bank of common weeds from the northern grain region of Australia. Five tillage and burning treatments were incorporated in a field experiment, at Armidale (30 degrees 30'S, 151 degrees 40'E), New South Wales, Australia in July 2004 in a randomized block design replicated four times. The trial was continued and treatments repeated in July 2005 with all the mature plants from the first year being allowed to shed seed in their respective treatment plots. The treatments were (i) no tillage (NT), (ii) chisel ploughing (CP), (iii) mould board ploughing (MBP), (iv) wheat straw burning with no tillage (SBNT) and (v) wheat straw burning with chisel ploughing (SBC). Soil samples were collected before applying treatments and before the weeds flowered to establish the seed bank status of the various weeds in the soil. Wheat was sown after the tillage treatments. Burning treatments were only initiated in the second year, one month prior to tillage treatments. The major weeds present in the seed bank before initiating the trial were Polygonum aviculare, Sonchus oleraceus and Avena fatua. Tillage promoted the germination of other weeds like Hibiscus trionum, Medicago sativa, Vicia sp. and Phalaris paradoxa later in the season in 2004 and Convolvulus erubescens emerged as a new weed in 2005. The MBP treatment in 2004 reduced the weed biomass to a significantly lower level of 55 g/m2 than the other treatments of CP (118 g/m2) and NT plots (196 g/m2) (P < 0.05). However, in 2005 SBC and MBP treatments were similar in reducing the weed biomass. In 2004, the grain yield trend of wheat was significantly different between CP and NT, and MBP and NT (P < 0.05) with maximum yield of 5898 kg/ha in CP and 5731 kg/ha in MBP. Rainfall before the start of the second trial season promoted the germination of a large numbers of weeds. SBC and MBP treatments reduced the numbers of most of the individual weed species compared with CP, SBNT and NT. SBC was able to destroy a large proportion of seeds most likely through burning and burying some in the soil and was found to be the best treatment in exhausting the seed bank followed closely by MBP which probably buried large number of seeds deep in the soil and promoted others to germinate. CP might have buried some of the seeds in the top 5-10 cm but also promoted parts of the seed bank to germinate. SBNT and NT provided an ideal medium for weeds to germinate and resulted in heavy infestations of weeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polygonum aviculare, Sonchus oleraceus and Avena fatua dominated the initial weed seed bank.

Interactor
Polygonum avicularePolygonum avicularee0weed
Outcome
major weeds present in the seed banke0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Polygonum aviculare
Polygonum aviculare · InteractorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The major weeds present in the seed bank before initiating the trial were Polygonum aviculare, Sonchus oleraceus and Avena fatua.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage promoted germination of several weeds later in 2004.

Treatment
Tillagee0
Interactor
Hibiscus trionumHibiscus trionume0weed
Outcome
germination of other weedse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus trionum
Hibiscus trionum · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Bogdan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tillage promoted the germination of other weeds like Hibiscus trionum, Medicago sativa, Vicia sp. and Phalaris paradoxa later in the season in 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1546 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Convolvulus erubescens emerged as a new weed in 2005.

Interactor
Convolvulus erubescensConvolvulus erubescense0weed
Outcome
emerged as a new weede0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Convolvulus erubescens
Convolvulus erubescens · InteractorAllthingsnative · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Convolvulus erubescens emerged as a new weed in 2005.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mould board ploughing reduced weed biomass to 55 g/m2 in 2004 versus 118 g/m2 under chisel ploughing.

Treatment
MBP treatmente0
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
55 g/m2e0
Qualifier
118 g/m2e0
Comparator
CPe0

Not reportedTaxonInteractor

Verbatim

e0

“The MBP treatment in 2004 reduced the weed biomass to a significantly lower level of 55 g/m2 than the other treatments of CP (118 g/m2) and NT plots (196 g/m2) (P < 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mould board ploughing reduced weed biomass to 55 g/m2 in 2004 versus 196 g/m2 without tillage.

Treatment
MBP treatmente0
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
55 g/m2e0
Qualifier
196 g/m2e0
Comparator
NT plotse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The MBP treatment in 2004 reduced the weed biomass to a significantly lower level of 55 g/m2 than the other treatments of CP (118 g/m2) and NT plots (196 g/m2) (P < 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2005 stubble burning with chisel ploughing and mould board ploughing reduced weed biomass similarly.

Treatment
SBCe0
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
MBPe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“in 2005 SBC and MBP treatments were similar in reducing the weed biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2004 chisel ploughing produced the maximum wheat grain yield of 5898 kg/ha.

Treatment
CPe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5898 kg/hae0
Comparator
NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2004, the grain yield trend of wheat was significantly different between CP and NT, and MBP and NT (P < 0.05) with maximum yield of 5898 kg/ha in CP and 5731 kg/ha in MBP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–2034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2004 mould board ploughing produced wheat grain yield of 5731 kg/ha, significantly different from no tillage.

Treatment
MBPe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
5731 kg/hae0
Comparator
NTe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2004, the grain yield trend of wheat was significantly different between CP and NT, and MBP and NT (P < 0.05) with maximum yield of 5898 kg/ha in CP and 5731 kg/ha in MBP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–2034 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall preceding the second season promoted weed germination.

Treatment
Rainfalle0
Outcome
germination of a large numbers of weedse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Rainfall before the start of the second trial season promoted the germination of a large numbers of weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2035–2141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stubble burning with chisel ploughing reduced most individual weed counts relative to chisel ploughing, burning alone and no tillage.

Treatment
SBCe0
Outcome
numbers of most of the individual weed speciese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
CP, SBNT and NTe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“SBC and MBP treatments reduced the numbers of most of the individual weed species compared with CP, SBNT and NT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2142–2254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mould board ploughing reduced most individual weed counts relative to chisel ploughing, burning alone and no tillage.

Treatment
MBPe0
Outcome
numbers of most of the individual weed speciese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
CP, SBNT and NTe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“SBC and MBP treatments reduced the numbers of most of the individual weed species compared with CP, SBNT and NT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2142–2254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stubble burning with chisel ploughing exhausted the weed seed bank best.

Treatment
SBCe0
Outcome
exhausting the seed banke0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
MBPe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“SBC was able to destroy a large proportion of seeds most likely through burning and burying some in the soil and was found to be the best treatment in exhausting the seed bank followed closely by MBP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2255–2454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chisel ploughing promoted germination of part of the weed seed bank.

Treatment
CPe0
Outcome
parts of the seed bank to germinatee0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CP might have buried some of the seeds in the top 5-10 cm but also promoted parts of the seed bank to germinate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2550–2662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burning without tillage and no tillage resulted in heavy weed infestations.

Treatment
SBNT and NTe0
Outcome
heavy infestations of weedse0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“SBNT and NT provided an ideal medium for weeds to germinate and resulted in heavy infestations of weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2663–2767 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

fire · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.