Abstract
Nineteen isolates of Paecilomyces lilacinus from different countries and different regions of Brazil and one isolate of Cylindrocarpon destructans were evaluated in vitro for parasitism of eggs of Meloidogyne javanica. The isolates varied in their ability to colonize eggs. In greenhouse studies with tomato plants, isolates of P. lilacinus and C. destructans reduced the number of galls of M. javanica but differed in effectiveness. The isolates of Paecilomyces lilacinus from France and Italy were the most effective in both in vitro and greenhouse experiments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
The fungal isolates varied in their ability to colonize Meloidogyne javanica eggs in vitro.
- Taxon
- Paecilomyces lilacinus
Purpureocillium lilacinume1 - Interactor
- Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae1pathogen
- Outcome
- ability to colonize eggse0
- Setting
- in vitroe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The isolates varied in their ability to colonize eggs”
e1“Nineteen isolates of Paecilomyces lilacinus from different countries and different regions of Brazil and one isolate of Cylindrocarpon destructans were evaluated in vitro for parasitism of eggs of Meloidogyne javanica”
Claim · model-written summary
Paecilomyces lilacinus isolates reduced Meloidogyne javanica galls on tomato plants, with differing effectiveness.
- Taxon
- tomato plants
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- isolates of P. lilacinuse0
- Interactor
- M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- number of galls of M. javanicae0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In greenhouse studies with tomato plants, isolates of P. lilacinus and C. destructans reduced the number of galls of M. javanica but differed in effectiveness”
t0“Paecilomyces lilacinus”
Claim · model-written summary
Cylindrocarpon destructans reduced Meloidogyne javanica galls on tomato plants, with differing effectiveness.
- Taxon
- tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- C. destructanse0
- Interactor
- M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- C. destructansIlyonectria destructanse0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- number of galls of M. javanicae0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In greenhouse studies with tomato plants, isolates of P. lilacinus and C. destructans reduced the number of galls of M. javanica but differed in effectiveness”
t0“Cylindrocarpon destructans”
Claim · model-written summary
Paecilomyces lilacinus isolates from France and Italy were the most effective in vitro and in greenhouse experiments.
- Taxon
- tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
- Interactor
- Paecilomyces lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- most effectivee0
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The isolates of Paecilomyces lilacinus from France and Italy were the most effective in both in vitro and greenhouse experiments”
e1“In greenhouse studies with tomato plants”
The same questions in other papers
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.