Paper · 2004 · Civil War Book Review

SUGARCANE GROWTH AS INFLUENCED BY NEMATODES AND PYTHIUM ARRHENOMANES

Jason P. Bond; E. C. McGawley; J. W. Hoy

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The single and combined effects of nematodes and the sugarcane root-rot pathogen, Pythium arrhenomanes, were evaluated in greenhouse trials conducted in 1996, 1997, and 1998. Individually, P. arrhenomanes and nematodes both reduced shoot and root growth. A community comprised of Mesocriconema xenoplax, Paratrichodorus minor and Tylenchorhynchus annulatus consistently reduced root growth across two infestation levels. Shoot growth was suppressed only at the highest infestation level. Shoot and root growth were consistently suppressed by both low and high infestation levels of P. arrhenomanes. Significant interactions occurred between nematodes and P. arrhenomanes. The fungus reduced nematode populations resulting in a less than additive response for plant growth suppression. Root colonization by P. arrhenomanes was influenced by nematode infestation in only one year. Temperature had an impact on the pathogens. Reproduction by T. annulatus was higher at 30°C than 20°C. The inverse of was observed for reproduction of M. xenoplax, P. minor and root colonization by P. arrhenomanes. The relative importance and interactions among these soil borne pathogens affecting sugarcane will depend on weather and soil conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. arrhenomanes reduced shoot and root growth.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
P. arrhenomanese0
Interactor
P. arrhenomanesPythium arrhenomanese0pathogen
Outcome
shoot and root growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Individually, P. arrhenomanes and nematodes both reduced shoot and root growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–254 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematodes reduced shoot and root growth.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
nematodese0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pathogen
Outcome
shoot and root growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Individually, P. arrhenomanes and nematodes both reduced shoot and root growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–254 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A three species nematode community reduced root growth at two infestation levels.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
community comprised of Mesocriconema xenoplax, Paratrichodorus minor and Tylenchorhynchus annulatuse0
Interactor
Mesocriconema xenoplaxMesocriconema xenoplaxe0pathogen
Second interactor
Paratrichodorus minorParatrichodorus minore0pathogen
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
Tylenchorhynchus annulatuse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A community comprised of Mesocriconema xenoplax, Paratrichodorus minor and Tylenchorhynchus annulatus consistently reduced root growth across two infestation levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–420 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematodes suppressed shoot growth only at highest infestation.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
highest infestation levele0
Outcome
Shoot growthe0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot growth was suppressed only at the highest infestation level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low and high P. arrhenomanes infestation suppressed shoot and root growth.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
low and high infestation levels of P. arrhenomanese0
Interactor
P. arrhenomanesPythium arrhenomanese0pathogen
Outcome
Shoot and root growthe0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot and root growth were consistently suppressed by both low and high infestation levels of P. arrhenomanes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. arrhenomanes reduced nematode populations.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
The funguse0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pathogen
Second interactor
funguse0pathogen
Outcome
nematode populationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The fungus reduced nematode populations resulting in a less than additive response for plant growth suppression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined pathogens produced less than additive plant growth suppression.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Outcome
plant growth suppressione0
Direction
less than additivee0

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in a less than additive response for plant growth suppression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode infestation influenced root colonization in one year.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
nematode infestatione0
Interactor
P. arrhenomanesPythium arrhenomanese0pathogen
Outcome
Root colonization by P. arrhenomanese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Root colonization by P. arrhenomanes was influenced by nematode infestation in only one year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. annulatus reproduction was higher at 30°C than 20°C.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
30°Ce0
Interactor
T. annulatusTylenchorhynchus annulatuse0pathogen
Outcome
Reproduction by T. annulatuse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
20°Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“Reproduction by T. annulatus was higher at 30°C than 20°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑

Pythium arrhenomanes · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

infection · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.