Paper · 2009 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Production potential, biological feasibility and economics of guinea grass (Stylosanthes hamata) intercropping systems under various fertility levels in rainfed conditions

Shri Ram

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2003-07on sandy loam soil to study the effect of row ratios and fertility levels on growth, persistence of legume, productivity, quality and monetary returns of guinea grass-Stylosanthes hamata (L.) Taub intercropping system under rainfed conditions. Intercropping of guinea grass with S. hamata in paired row gave significantly higher green forage (20.35 tonnes/ha), dry forage (5.01 tonnes/ha) and crude protein yields (438.8 kg/ha) compared with the sole stand of both grass and legume and alternate row and it was at par with 3:3 and 4:4 row ratios during all the four years. The dry matter yields of the recommended dose of fertilizer was reduced by 22.71% over 75% of recommended dose of fertilizer + 5 tonnes farmyard manure/ha. Persistence of S. hamata were higher (85.19, 74.72 and 69.78%) in its sole stand when compared to alternate row of grass legume intercropping (76.26, 56.38 and 45.37%) during all the three years. Intercropping of guinea grass with S. hamata in all the row ratios resulted in land equivalent ratio >1, indicating intercropping advantages. The maximum values of the relative crowding co-efficient was recorded in paired row of grass-legume intercropping, which indicated comparative yield advantage of this system over the other intercropping treatments. The maximum net returns (Rs 5 103/ha) as well as net returns/Re invested (0.72) were obtained in paired row of grass-legume intercropping. Among fertility levels, highest net returns (Rs 5 276/ ha) and net return/Re invested (0.55) were achieved with application of 75% of the recommended dose of fertilizer in combination with 5 tonnes farmyard manure/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired-row intercropping increased green forage yield to 20.35 tonnes/ha versus sole stands and alternate rows.

Taxon
guinea grassMegathyrsus maximuse0
Treatment
Intercropping of guinea grass with S. hamata in paired rowe0
Outcome
green foragee0
Direction
highere0
Value
20.35 tonnes/hae0
Comparator
sole stand of both grass and legume and alternate rowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of guinea grass with S. hamata in paired row gave significantly higher green forage (20.35 tonnes/ha), dry forage (5.01 tonnes/ha) and crude protein yields (438.8 kg/ha) compared with the sole stand of both grass and legume and alternate row”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired-row intercropping increased dry forage yield to 5.01 tonnes/ha.

Taxon
guinea grassMegathyrsus maximuse0
Treatment
Intercropping of guinea grass with S. hamata in paired rowe0
Outcome
dry foragee0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.01 tonnes/hae0
Comparator
sole stand of both grass and legume and alternate rowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of guinea grass with S. hamata in paired row gave significantly higher green forage (20.35 tonnes/ha), dry forage (5.01 tonnes/ha) and crude protein yields (438.8 kg/ha) compared with the sole stand of both grass and legume and alternate row”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired-row intercropping increased crude protein yield to 438.8 kg/ha.

Taxon
guinea grassMegathyrsus maximuse0
Treatment
Intercropping of guinea grass with S. hamata in paired rowe0
Outcome
crude protein yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
438.8 kg/hae0
Comparator
sole stand of both grass and legume and alternate rowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of guinea grass with S. hamata in paired row gave significantly higher green forage (20.35 tonnes/ha), dry forage (5.01 tonnes/ha) and crude protein yields (438.8 kg/ha) compared with the sole stand of both grass and legume and alternate row”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended fertilizer alone yielded 22.71% less dry matter than 75% fertilizer plus farmyard manure.

Taxon
guinea grassMegathyrsus maximust0
Treatment
recommended dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
dry matter yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22.71%e0
Comparator
75% of recommended dose of fertilizer + 5 tonnes farmyard manure/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter yields of the recommended dose of fertilizer was reduced by 22.71% over 75% of recommended dose of fertilizer + 5 tonnes farmyard manure/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“guinea grass (Stylosanthes hamata) intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. hamata persisted more in sole stand than alternate-row intercropping across three years.

Taxon
S. hamataStylosanthes hamatae0
Treatment
sole stande0
Outcome
Persistencee0
Direction
highere0
Value
85.19, 74.72 and 69.78%e0
Comparator
alternate row of grass legume intercroppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stylosanthes hamata
Stylosanthes hamata · TaxonDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Persistence of S. hamata were higher (85.19, 74.72 and 69.78%) in its sole stand when compared to alternate row of grass legume intercropping (76.26, 56.38 and 45.37%) during all the three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–970 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All intercropping row ratios had land equivalent ratio greater than one.

Taxon
guinea grassMegathyrsus maximuse0
Treatment
Intercropping of guinea grass with S. hamatae0
Outcome
land equivalent ratioe0
Value
>1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of guinea grass with S. hamata in all the row ratios resulted in land equivalent ratio >1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1075 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired rows gave the maximum relative crowding coefficient.

Taxon
guinea grassMegathyrsus maximust0
Treatment
paired row of grass-legume intercroppinge0
Outcome
relative crowding co-efficiente0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum values of the relative crowding co-efficient was recorded in paired row of grass-legume intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“guinea grass (Stylosanthes hamata) intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired-row intercropping gave maximum net returns of Rs 5 103/ha.

Taxon
guinea grassMegathyrsus maximust0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs 5 103/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum net returns (Rs 5 103/ha) as well as net returns/Re invested (0.72) were obtained in paired row of grass-legume intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“guinea grass (Stylosanthes hamata) intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired-row intercropping gave net returns per rupee invested of 0.72.

Taxon
guinea grassMegathyrsus maximust0
Outcome
net returns/Re investede0
Value
0.72e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum net returns (Rs 5 103/ha) as well as net returns/Re invested (0.72) were obtained in paired row of grass-legume intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“guinea grass (Stylosanthes hamata) intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% fertilizer plus manure treatment gave highest net returns of Rs 5 276/ ha.

Taxon
guinea grassMegathyrsus maximust0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs 5 276/ hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest net returns (Rs 5 276/ ha) and net return/Re invested (0.55) were achieved with application of 75% of the recommended dose of fertilizer in combination with 5 tonnes farmyard manure/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1684 · show in text ↑
t0

“guinea grass (Stylosanthes hamata) intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% fertilizer plus manure treatment gave net return per rupee invested of 0.55.

Taxon
guinea grassMegathyrsus maximust0
Outcome
net return/Re investede0
Value
0.55e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest net returns (Rs 5 276/ ha) and net return/Re invested (0.55) were achieved with application of 75% of the recommended dose of fertilizer in combination with 5 tonnes farmyard manure/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1684 · show in text ↑
t0

“guinea grass (Stylosanthes hamata) intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–118 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Megathyrsus maximus (Guinea grass)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 38 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

intercropping · quality: protein · Megathyrsus maximus (Guinea grass)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.