Paper · 2012 · Pest Management Science

Antibacterial activity of two chitosan solutions and their effect on rice bacterial leaf blight and leaf streak

Bin Li; Baoping Liu; Changlin Shan; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
110
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bacterial leaf blight and leaf streak are the two most damaging bacterial diseases of rice. However, few bactericidal chemicals are available for controlling both diseases. The antibacterial properties of two kinds of chitosan with different molecular weights and degrees of N-deacetylation and their effect on rice bacterial leaf blight and leaf streak were evaluated. RESULTS: Results showed that the two kinds of chitosan solution possess a strong antibacterial activity against both rice bacterial pathogens and significantly reduced disease incidence and severity by comparison with the control under greenhouse conditions. However, the interaction between chitosan and rice pathogens was affected by the type and concentration of chitosan, the bacterial species and the contact time between chitosan and bacteria. The direct antibacterial activity of chitosan may be attributed to both membrane lysis and the destruction of biofilm. In addition, both chitosan solutions significantly increased the activities of phenylalanine ammonia lyase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase in rice seedlings following inoculation of two rice pathogens by comparison with the control. CONCLUSION: The role of chitosan in protection of rice against bacterial pathogens has been shown to involve direct antibacterial activity and indirect induced resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both chitosan solutions showed strong antibacterial activity against rice bacterial pathogens.

Treatment
two kinds of chitosan solutione0
Interactor
rice bacterial pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
antibacterial activity against both rice bacterial pathogense0
Direction
stronge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“the two kinds of chitosan solution possess a strong antibacterial activity against both rice bacterial pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both chitosan solutions significantly reduced rice disease incidence versus control in a greenhouse.

Treatment
chitosane1
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly reduced disease incidence and severity by comparison with the control under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–639 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two kinds of chitosan solution possess a strong antibacterial activity against both rice bacterial pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both chitosan solutions significantly reduced rice disease severity versus control in a greenhouse.

Treatment
chitosane1
Outcome
disease incidence and severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly reduced disease incidence and severity by comparison with the control under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–639 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two kinds of chitosan solution possess a strong antibacterial activity against both rice bacterial pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–523 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan-pathogen interaction varied with chitosan type, concentration, bacterial species and contact time.

Treatment
chitosane0
Interactor
rice pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
interaction between chitosan and rice pathogense0
Qualifier
type and concentration of chitosan, the bacterial species and the contact timee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“the interaction between chitosan and rice pathogens was affected by the type and concentration of chitosan, the bacterial species and the contact time between chitosan and bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–830 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct antibacterial activity may be attributable to membrane lysis and biofilm destruction.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
direct antibacterial activitye0
Qualifier
membrane lysis and the destruction of biofilme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“The direct antibacterial activity of chitosan may be attributed to both membrane lysis and the destruction of biofilm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both chitosan solutions significantly increased phenylalanine ammonia lyase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities in pathogen-inoculated rice seedlings.

Treatment
both chitosan solutionse0
Interactor
rice pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
activities of phenylalanine ammonia lyase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidasee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“both chitosan solutions significantly increased the activities of phenylalanine ammonia lyase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase in rice seedlings following inoculation of two rice pathogens by comparison with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1185 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed chitosan protection to direct antibacterial action and induced resistance.

Treatment
chitosane0
Interactor
bacterial pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
protection of rice against bacterial pathogense0
Qualifier
direct antibacterial activity and indirect induced resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“The role of chitosan in protection of rice against bacterial pathogens has been shown to involve direct antibacterial activity and indirect induced resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1357 · show in text ↑

chitosan · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

chitosan · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.