Paper · 2015 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Assessment of salinity tolerance threshold for two wheat genotypes in response to zinc

Payman Keshavarz; Saeed Saadat

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plants’ tolerance to salt stress is different among species, nevertheless, mineral nutrition might also affect it. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of Zinc (Zn) on salinity tolerance using a sigmoid response model in two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes ‘Falat’ and ‘Bam’ with different salinity tolerances. The treatments consisted of three Zn rates (0, 5 and 10 mg Zn kg−1) and five levels of soil salinity (1.1, 6.5, 12.3, 18.7 and 25.1 dS m−1). The results showed that dry weight of straw and grain decreased, as salinity increased in both genotypes although this decrease in ‘Falat’ genotype was higher than that of ‘Bam’ genotype. Application of 10 mg kg−1 Zn increased the dry weight by 25% (straw) and 32% (grain) in ‘Falat’ but 67% (straw) and 60% (grain) in ‘Bam’ as compared with the absence of added Zn. According to the fitted function, in the absence of Zn, grain production began to decline at ECe-values of 4.7 dS m−1 in ‘Falat’ genotype, and 7.5 dS m−1 in ‘Bam’ genotype. Application of Zn led to a decrease of salinity tolerance in ‘Falat’ genotype, but an increase in ‘Bam’ genotype. The study found that Zn application under saline conditions, depending on genetic differences of wheat genotypes, would have different effects on their tolerance to salinity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity reduced straw and grain dry weight in both genotypes, more strongly in Falat.

Material
‘Falat’ genotypee0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
dry weight of straw and graine0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
‘Bam’ genotypee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry weight of straw and grain decreased, as salinity increased in both genotypes although this decrease in ‘Falat’ genotype was higher than that of ‘Bam’ genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten mg kg−1 Zn increased Falat straw dry weight by 25% versus no added Zn.

Material
‘Falat’e0
Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
10 mg kg−1 Zne0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
absence of added Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 10 mg kg−1 Zn increased the dry weight by 25% (straw) and 32% (grain) in ‘Falat’ but 67% (straw) and 60% (grain) in ‘Bam’ as compared with the absence of added Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten mg kg−1 Zn increased Falat grain dry weight by 32% versus no added Zn.

Material
‘Falat’e0
Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
10 mg kg−1 Zne0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
absence of added Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 10 mg kg−1 Zn increased the dry weight by 25% (straw) and 32% (grain) in ‘Falat’ but 67% (straw) and 60% (grain) in ‘Bam’ as compared with the absence of added Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten mg kg−1 Zn increased Bam straw dry weight by 67% versus no added Zn.

Material
‘Bam’e0
Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
10 mg kg−1 Zne0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
67%e0
Comparator
absence of added Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 10 mg kg−1 Zn increased the dry weight by 25% (straw) and 32% (grain) in ‘Falat’ but 67% (straw) and 60% (grain) in ‘Bam’ as compared with the absence of added Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten mg kg−1 Zn increased Bam grain dry weight by 60% versus no added Zn.

Material
‘Bam’e0
Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
10 mg kg−1 Zne0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
60%e0
Comparator
absence of added Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 10 mg kg−1 Zn increased the dry weight by 25% (straw) and 32% (grain) in ‘Falat’ but 67% (straw) and 60% (grain) in ‘Bam’ as compared with the absence of added Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Without zinc, fitted grain production began declining at 4.7 dS m−1 in Falat.

Material
‘Falat’e0
Treatment
absence of Zne0
Outcome
grain productione0
Direction
declinee0
Value
4.7 dS m−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the absence of Zn, grain production began to decline at ECe-values of 4.7 dS m−1 in ‘Falat’ genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Without zinc, fitted grain production began declining at 7.5 dS m−1 in Bam.

Material
‘Bam’e0
Treatment
absence of Zne0
Outcome
grain productione0
Direction
declinee0
Value
7.5 dS m−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the absence of Zn, grain production began to decline at ECe-values of 4.7 dS m−1 in ‘Falat’ genotype, and 7.5 dS m−1 in ‘Bam’ genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc decreased salinity tolerance in Falat.

Material
‘Falat’e0
Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
salinity tolerancee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Zn led to a decrease of salinity tolerance in ‘Falat’ genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc increased salinity tolerance in Bam.

Material
‘Bam’e0
Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
salinity tolerancee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Zn led to a decrease of salinity tolerance in ‘Falat’ genotype, but an increase in ‘Bam’ genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · tolerance: abiotic · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.