Paper · 2013 · Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System)

Systems Evaluation of Shallow Anhydrous Ammonia Placements, Rates, and Timing on Maize Plant Uniformity, Yield and N Use Efficiency

Péter Kovács

20
claims
42
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Farmers face increasing expectations from society to be more environmentally conscious and energy efficient with their fertilizer management practices during maize (Zea mays L.) production. With the advent of precision guidance systems, maize farmers in various tillage systems have more options in pre-plant nutrient banding relative to the intended crop rows or throughout the entire growing season. Field studies were conducted between 2010 and 2012 near West Lafayette, IN to identify best management practices to enhance maize plant uniformity, yield and nitrogen (N) efficiencies. Anhydrous ammonia (NH3) placement during pre-plant application is of interest because of concerns for possible NH3 toxicity to maize seedlings when high NH3 rates are applied too close to the seed row. Traditional pre-plant NH3 applications typically occur at an angle (diagonally) to the intended maize row potentially creating varying N availability to plants within-row, increasing plant-to-plant variability, and perhaps reducing grain yield. The first field studies were conducted to compare maize plant growth, grain yield, and plant-to-plant variability responses to two shallow pre-plant NH3 placements (diagonal to the row versus parallel but 15-cm offset from the row) to a depth of about 12 cm in both no-till and conventional tillage systems at N rates of 145 and 202 kg N ha-1. Maize was planted at a seeding rate of 85,000 seeds ha-1 with additional starter N (20 kg N ha-1 as 10-34-0 fertilizer) within 6 days of NH3 application. The individually barcode-identified plants were intensely monitored for morpho-physiological traits in the same row of each plot from seedling emergence through multiple growth stages until maturity, when all plants (totaling 6,250 plants over the three-year period) were hand-harvested and their respective grain yield components were documented. Contrary to expectations, parallel NH3 application did not generally improve plant-to-plant uniformity in either plant growth (plant height, stalk diameter, stem volume), plant N status (leaf SPAD readings) or in final grain weight, relative to diagonal application, across a range of tillage and N rate treatments. Perhaps the parallel application treatment placed the NH3 too close (15 cm) to the maize rows, especially in the year with the shortest time interval between NH3 application timing and planting (only one day in 2011). In 2011, increased plant-to-plant variability was already present at seedling emergence and persisted through the growing season, and more barren plants and increased variation in kernel number and per-plant grain weight were observed than in 2010 and 2012. Conventional tillage generally lowered plant-to-plant variation for most plant parameters measured, and resulted in consistently higher yields than no-till. Plant responses were only minimally influenced by varying distance within the row from the point of row intersection with the NH3 band in diagonal-applied treatments. Plant distance from NH3 band in the row explained only up to 5% of the plant-to-plant variation in morpho-physiological responses. However, individual-plant grain weight were consistently lower near the NH3 band in all treatments with diagonal NH3 application in 2011, and there was a similar trend for lower individual plant size and yields close to the diagonal NH3 band each year at the higher N rate (202 kg N ha-1) in the no-till system. Multiple linear regressions identified time of silk emergence, estimated stem volumes at V15 or at R1 growth stages, and the stalk diameter at R3 growth stage, as the most influential plant developmental parameters to determine per-plant grain weights. Variation in thermal units to seedling emergence, and plant spacing variation had almost zero impact on final yields. Parallel NH3 placement improved whole-season N uptake, relative to diagonal placement, at the 145 kg N ha-1 rate and in no-till tillage system. The tillage system did not impact reproductive-stage leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD), or whole-plant N content at maturity when NH3 was parallel-applied, but these plant responses were significantly lower in no-till after diagonal application. Lowering the pre-plant N rate to 145 from 202 kg N ha-1 significantly lowered maize whole-plant biomass and N accumulation at maturity with diagonal application, but not when NH3 was parallel applied. Another three-year field study investigated the effect of timing (and associated placement) of shallow NH3 on maize grain yield (GYA), N recovery efficiency (NRE), and N use efficiency (NUE) at multiple N rates. Three NH3 application timings (100% pre-plant in spring just days before planting, 100% side-dress at V6-V7 growth stage, and split NH3 applications) and four N rates (0, 90, 145, and 202 kg N ha-1) were evaluated in a factorial combination. The NH3 was injected to a depth of 12 cm. Pre-plant NH3 was banded parallel to, but about 15 cm offset from, the intended maize rows, while the side-dress NH3 was applied in the traditional mid-row position for maize grown in 76.2 cm row widths. Maize GYA, and whole-plant N accumulation at maturity almost doubled with increasing N rates in 2010-2011, but maize response to NH3 in 2012 was limited by severe drought stress. Highest GYA was observed with the side-dress 202 kg N ha-1 rate in 2010-2011, but with the pre-plant 202 kg N ha-1 rate in 2012. However, whole-plant N uptake was consistently highest in the pre-plant 202 kg N ha-1 treatment in both 2010-2011 and 2012. Pre-plant NH3 application improved NRE from 0.60 to 0.67 kg plant N kg-1 applied N in 2010-2011 but from 0.39 to 0.67 kg plant N kg-1 applied N in 2012, relative to side-dress NH3 (whole-plant N recovery equaled ~ 67% of applied N fertilizer across pre-plant N rates in 2010-2011 and 2012). Average NRE and NUE (based on GYA gain to the added fertilizer compared to 0 kg N ha-1 treatment) declined with increasing N rates as expected. Although overall NUE levels in 2012 declined by more than 55% relative to 2010-2011 due to drought, pre-plant and split NH3 applications achieved much higher NUE than side-dress. This study highlighted the GYA and NUE vulnerability of one-time NH3 application strategies in maize production with inclement weather, and the occurrence of sometimes wide divergences between NRE and NUE in treatment responses to both NH3 rates and timing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parallel ammonia placement did not generally improve plant growth uniformity relative to diagonal placement.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
parallel NH3 applicatione0
Outcome
plant-to-plant uniformity in either plant growth (plant height, stalk diameter, stem volume)e0
Direction
did not generally improvee0
Comparator
diagonal applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“parallel NH3 application did not generally improve plant-to-plant uniformity in either plant growth (plant height, stalk diameter, stem volume)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1906–2049 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative to diagonal application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2113–2145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parallel ammonia placement did not generally improve leaf SPAD uniformity relative to diagonal placement.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
parallel NH3 applicatione1
Outcome
plant N status (leaf SPAD readings)e0
Direction
did not generally improvee1
Comparator
diagonal applicatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant N status (leaf SPAD readings)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“parallel NH3 application did not generally improve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1906–1956 · show in text ↑
e2

“relative to diagonal application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2113–2145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parallel ammonia placement did not generally improve final grain-weight uniformity relative to diagonal placement.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
parallel NH3 applicatione1
Outcome
final grain weighte0
Direction
did not generally improvee1
Comparator
diagonal applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“or in final grain weight, relative to diagonal application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“parallel NH3 application did not generally improve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1906–1956 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2011, plant-to-plant variability was present at emergence and persisted through growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
seedling emergencee0
Outcome
plant-to-plant variabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
2011e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2011, increased plant-to-plant variability was already present at seedling emergence and persisted through the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2414–2542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2011, more barren plants occurred than in 2010 and 2012.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
barren plantse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
2010 and 2012e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more barren plants and increased variation in kernel number and per-plant grain weight were observed than in 2010 and 2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2548–2670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2011, variation in kernel number and per-plant grain weight exceeded 2010 and 2012.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
variation in kernel number and per-plant grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
2010 and 2012e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased variation in kernel number and per-plant grain weight were observed than in 2010 and 2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2571–2670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage generally lowered plant-to-plant variation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Conventional tillagee0
Outcome
plant-to-plant variatione0
Direction
lowerede0
Comparator
no-tille1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage generally lowered plant-to-plant variation for most plant parameters measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2672–2770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher yields than no-till”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2801–2827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage produced consistently higher yields than no-till.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Conventional tillagee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no-tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage generally lowered plant-to-plant variation for most plant parameters measured, and resulted in consistently higher yields than no-till”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2672–2827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within-row distance from a diagonal ammonia band explained up to 5% of plant-to-plant morphophysiological variation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Plant distance from NH3 band in the rowe0
Outcome
plant-to-plant variation in morpho-physiological responsese0
Value
up to 5%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant distance from NH3 band in the row explained only up to 5% of the plant-to-plant variation in morpho-physiological responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2996–3125 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2011, grain weight per plant was lower near the diagonal ammonia band.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
diagonal NH3 applicatione0
Outcome
individual-plant grain weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
2011e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“individual-plant grain weight were consistently lower near the NH3 band in all treatments with diagonal NH3 application in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3136–3263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high nitrogen rate in no-till, plants near the diagonal band tended to be smaller and lower yielding.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
higher N rate (202 kg N ha-1)e0
Outcome
individual plant size and yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
no-till systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a similar trend for lower individual plant size and yields close to the diagonal NH3 band each year at the higher N rate (202 kg N ha-1) in the no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3279–3437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silk emergence timing, stem volume at V15 or R1, and stalk diameter at R3 were the most influential predictors of per-plant grain weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
time of silk emergencee0
Outcome
per-plant grain weightse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“time of silk emergence, estimated stem volumes at V15 or at R1 growth stages, and the stalk diameter at R3 growth stage, as the most influential plant developmental parameters to determine per-plant grain weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3478–3690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variation in emergence thermal units and plant spacing had almost zero impact on final yields.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
seedling emergencee0
Outcome
final yieldse0
Direction
almost zero impacte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variation in thermal units to seedling emergence, and plant spacing variation had almost zero impact on final yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3692–3808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parallel placement improved whole-season nitrogen uptake at 145 kg N ha-1 in no-till relative to diagonal placement.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Parallel NH3 placemente0
Outcome
whole-season N uptakee0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
at the 145 kg N ha-1 rate and in no-till tillage systeme0
Comparator
diagonal placemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Parallel NH3 placement improved whole-season N uptake, relative to diagonal placement, at the 145 kg N ha-1 rate and in no-till tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3810–3952 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till lowered reproductive leaf SPAD and mature whole-plant N after diagonal ammonia application, while parallel application showed no tillage effect.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
no-tille0
Outcome
reproductive-stage leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD), or whole-plant N content at maturitye0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
after diagonal applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tillage system did not impact reproductive-stage leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD), or whole-plant N content at maturity when NH3 was parallel-applied, but these plant responses were significantly lower in no-till after diagonal application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3954–4196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowering pre-plant N rate from 202 to 145 kg N ha-1 lowered mature maize biomass and N accumulation under diagonal placement but not parallel placement.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
pre-plant N rate to 145e0
Outcome
whole-plant biomass and N accumulation at maturitye0
Direction
lowerede0
Qualifier
with diagonal application, but not when NH3 was parallel appliede0
Comparator
202 kg N ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lowering the pre-plant N rate to 145 from 202 kg N ha-1 significantly lowered maize whole-plant biomass and N accumulation at maturity with diagonal application, but not when NH3 was parallel applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4198–4397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield and mature whole-plant N accumulation almost doubled with increasing N rates in 2010-2011.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
increasing N ratese0
Outcome
GYA, and whole-plant N accumulation at maturitye0
Direction
almost doublede0
Setting
2010-2011e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize GYA, and whole-plant N accumulation at maturity almost doubled with increasing N rates in 2010-2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5099–5204 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought limited maize response to ammonia in 2012.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
severe drought stresse0
Outcome
response to NH3e0
Direction
limitede0
Setting
2012e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize response to NH3 in 2012 was limited by severe drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5210–5276 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield occurred with side-dress 202 kg N ha-1 in 2010-2011 and pre-plant 202 kg N ha-1 in 2012.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment
side-dress 202 kg N ha-1 ratee0
Outcome
GYAe0
Direction
Higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest GYA was observed with the side-dress 202 kg N ha-1 rate in 2010-2011, but with the pre-plant 202 kg N ha-1 rate in 2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5278–5405 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize GYA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5099–5108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-plant 202 kg N ha-1 consistently gave the highest whole-plant N uptake.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment
pre-plant 202 kg N ha-1 treatmente0
Outcome
whole-plant N uptakee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whole-plant N uptake was consistently highest in the pre-plant 202 kg N ha-1 treatment in both 2010-2011 and 2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5416–5529 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize GYA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5099–5108 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · phenology · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

44 papers: 29 positive, 15 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

tillage · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

748 papers: 619 positive, 129 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 619 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

744 papers more in this group

See all 748 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.