Paper · 2002 · Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer

Mycorrhizal colonization effects on C metabolism in relation to drought-tolerance of perennial ryegrass

Bok‐Rye Lee; Woo‐Jin Jung; Dae Hyun Kim; et al.

14
claims
34
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To investigate the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus (Glomus intraradices) colonization on drought-stress tolerance, leaf water potential, chlorophyll concentration, P content and carbohydrate composition were examined in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) plants exposed to drought-stressed or well-watered conditions. Drought stress significantly decreased leaf water potential, P content and leaf growth. These drought-induced damages were moderated by mycorrhizal colonization. Drought stress decreased the concentration of soluble sugars in shoots. AM plants had a higher foliar soluble sugar than non-AM plants under drought stress condition. Drought stress depressed the accumulation of starch and fructan in shoots, but stimulated in roots. Under drought-stressed condition, starch concentration in roots was higher in non-AM plants than in AM plants. Fructan was the largest pool of carbohydrates, showing the highest initial concentration and the highest net increase for 28 days of treatment. Drought stress slightly decreased fructan concentration in shoots, but remarkably increased in roots. Under drought-stressed condition, fructan concentrations in non-AM and AM shoots at day 28 were 18.7% and 13.3% lower than the corresponding values measured at well-watered plants. However, in the roots, fructan accumulation caused by drought was lessen 13.6% by mycorrhizal colonization. The results obtained suggest that mycorrhizal colonization improves drought tolerance of the host plants by maintaining higher leaf water status and P status, and by retaining more foliar soluble sugars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased ryegrass leaf water potential, P content and leaf growth.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
leaf water potential, P content and leaf growthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly decreased leaf water potential, P content and leaf growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–423 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization moderated drought-induced damage in ryegrass.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Treatment
mycorrhizal colonizatione0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese2symbiont
Outcome
drought-induced damagese0
Direction
moderatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These drought-induced damages were moderated by mycorrhizal colonization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–497 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–272 · show in text ↑
e2

“arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus (Glomus intraradices)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased soluble sugar concentration in ryegrass shoots.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
concentration of soluble sugarse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress decreased the concentration of soluble sugars in shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–569 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, AM ryegrass had higher foliar soluble sugar than non-AM ryegrass.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Treatment
AM plantse0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese2symbiont
Outcome
foliar soluble sugare0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
drought stress conditione0
Comparator
non-AM plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AM plants had a higher foliar soluble sugar than non-AM plants under drought stress condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–272 · show in text ↑
e2

“arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus (Glomus intraradices)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought depressed starch and fructan accumulation in ryegrass shoots.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
accumulation of starch and fructane0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress depressed the accumulation of starch and fructan in shoots, but stimulated in roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stimulated starch and fructan accumulation in ryegrass roots.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
accumulation of starch and fructane0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress depressed the accumulation of starch and fructan in shoots, but stimulated in roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, root starch was higher in non-AM than AM ryegrass.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
non-AM plantse0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese2symbiont
Outcome
starch concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
AM plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought-stressed condition, starch concentration in roots was higher in non-AM plants than in AM plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–875 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–272 · show in text ↑
e2

“arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus (Glomus intraradices)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fructan was the largest carbohydrate pool and had the highest initial concentration and net increase over 28 days.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Outcome
Fructan was the largest pool of carbohydratese0
Qualifier
28 days of treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fructan was the largest pool of carbohydrates, showing the highest initial concentration and the highest net increase for 28 days of treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought slightly decreased shoot fructan concentration.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
fructan concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress slightly decreased fructan concentration in shoots, but remarkably increased in roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1121 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought markedly increased root fructan concentration.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
fructan concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress slightly decreased fructan concentration in shoots, but remarkably increased in roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1121 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At day 28, shoot fructan in drought-stressed non-AM ryegrass was 18.7% below well-watered plants.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
non-AMe0
Outcome
fructan concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
18.7%e0
Qualifier
day 28e0
Comparator
well-watered plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fructan concentrations in non-AM and AM shoots at day 28 were 18.7% and 13.3% lower than the corresponding values measured at well-watered plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1302 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At day 28, shoot fructan in drought-stressed AM ryegrass was 13.3% below well-watered plants.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
AM shootse0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese2symbiont
Outcome
fructan concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
13.3%e0
Qualifier
day 28e0
Comparator
well-watered plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fructan concentrations in non-AM and AM shoots at day 28 were 18.7% and 13.3% lower than the corresponding values measured at well-watered plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1302 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–272 · show in text ↑
e2

“arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus (Glomus intraradices)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization lessened drought-induced root fructan accumulation by 13.6%.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
mycorrhizal colonizatione0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese2symbiont
Outcome
fructan accumulatione0
Direction
lessene0
Value
13.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the roots, fructan accumulation caused by drought was lessen 13.6% by mycorrhizal colonization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1410 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–272 · show in text ↑
e2

“arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus (Glomus intraradices)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–86 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest mycorrhizal colonization improves ryegrass drought tolerance by maintaining leaf water and P status and foliar soluble sugars.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Treatment
mycorrhizal colonizatione0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese2symbiont
Outcome
drought tolerancee0
Qualifier
maintaining higher leaf water status and P status, and by retaining more foliar soluble sugarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mycorrhizal colonization improves drought tolerance of the host plants by maintaining higher leaf water status and P status, and by retaining more foliar soluble sugars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1614 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–272 · show in text ↑
e2

“arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus (Glomus intraradices)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–86 · show in text ↑

drought · molecular: metabolites · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

drought · quality: sugar starch · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · Rhizophagus intraradices · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.