Paper · 2015 · http://www.issr-journals.org/links/papers.php?application%3Dpdf%26article%3DIJIAS-15-031-04%26journal%3Dijias

Effects of Biological Insecticides on Predatory Spider's Population in Rice Field

Muhammad Muddasir; Zuhaib Ahmad; Most. Jannatul Fardusi; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Copyright © 2015 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTRACT: The study was conducted to compare the effects of different biological insecticides: extracts of Azadirachta indica and Eucalyptus globulus, and Spinosad on spider’s population in a rice field at an agricultural farm in tehsil Daska of district Sialkot-51310, Pakistan. Spiders, as natural enemies play an important role in keeping pest population under control by not only feeding on pests but also limiting the availability of habitats open to pests by occupying various microhabitats in an agricultural ecosystem. The experiment was laid in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replicates. Biological insecticides including two botanical (extracts of Azadirachta indica and Eucalyptus globulus) and one microbial (Spinosad) were applied to the rice crop. The spider’s population was counted after one, three and seven days from insecticide application. After one day from insecticide application, the reduction in spider’s population was 42.18%, 36.68 % and 33.38% with Spinosad, A. indica (20 % conc.) and E. globolus (20 % conc.) respectively. The trend of reduction of spider’s population decreased with time from one to seven days. Spider’s population showed significantly higher resistance to botanical than microbial insecticide.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad reduced spider population by 42.18% after one day.

Treatment
Spinosade0
Interactor
spidere0other
Outcome
spider’s populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
42.18%e0
Qualifier
After one daye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After one day from insecticide application, the reduction in spider’s population was 42.18%, 36.68 % and 33.38% with Spinosad, A. indica (20 % conc.) and E. globolus (20 % conc.) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. indica at 20% concentration reduced spider population by 36.68% after one day.

Treatment
A. indica (20 % conc.)e0
Interactor
spidere0other
Outcome
spider’s populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
36.68 %e0
Qualifier
After one daye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After one day from insecticide application, the reduction in spider’s population was 42.18%, 36.68 % and 33.38% with Spinosad, A. indica (20 % conc.) and E. globolus (20 % conc.) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. globolus at 20% concentration reduced spider population by 33.38% after one day.

Treatment
E. globolus (20 % conc.)e0
Interactor
spidere0other
Outcome
spider’s populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
33.38%e0
Qualifier
After one daye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After one day from insecticide application, the reduction in spider’s population was 42.18%, 36.68 % and 33.38% with Spinosad, A. indica (20 % conc.) and E. globolus (20 % conc.) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–449 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spider population reduction waned between one and seven days.

Interactor
spidere0other
Outcome
reduction of spider’s populatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
one to seven dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The trend of reduction of spider’s population decreased with time from one to seven days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spiders were significantly more resistant to botanical than microbial insecticide.

Treatment
botanicale0
Interactor
Spidere0other
Outcome
Spider’s populatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
microbial insecticidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spider’s population showed significantly higher resistance to botanical than microbial insecticide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1508 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–449 · show in text ↑

spinosad · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Azadirachta indica · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

botanical · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 78 positive, 8 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.