Paper · 2005 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Efficacy of Tank Mixtures of Sulfosulfuron with Clodinafop and Fenoxaprop on Weeds in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

S. S. Punia; Parminder Shoeran; Surender Dahiya; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tank mixture of clodinafop+sulfosulfuron (3: 1) at 60 g ha−1 and fenoxaprop+sulfosulfuron (4: 1 and 5: I) at 120 g ha−1 provided 85–90% control of Avena ludoviciana and Phalaris minor and 60% control of broadleaf weeds like Chenopodium album. Melilotus indica and Rumex retroflexus. None of the herbicide combinations was effective against Convolvulus arvensis. Clodinafop+sulfosulfuron at lower dose of 50 g ha−1 and fenoxaprop+sulfosulfuron at 100 g ha−1 although provided good control of broadleaf weeds but poor control of grassy weeds. Maximum grain yield (5240 kg ha−1) was obtained in weed free treatment which was at par with clodinafop+sulfosulfllron (3: 1) at 60 g ha−1 and fenoxaprop+slllfoslllfuron (4: 1 or 5: 1) at 120 g ha−1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop plus sulfosulfuron controlled Avena ludoviciana and Phalaris minor by 85–90%.

Treatment
clodinafop+sulfosulfuron (3: 1) at 60 g ha−1e0
Interactor
Avena ludovicianaAvena sterilis subsp. ludovicianae0weed
Outcome
control of Avena ludoviciana and Phalaris minore0
Direction
controle0
Value
85–90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena sterilis subsp. ludoviciana
Avena sterilis subsp. ludoviciana · InteractorMarie PORTAS · CC BY-SA 2.0 fr · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tank mixture of clodinafop+sulfosulfuron (3: 1) at 60 g ha−1 and fenoxaprop+sulfosulfuron (4: 1 and 5: I) at 120 g ha−1 provided 85–90% control of Avena ludoviciana and Phalaris minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop plus sulfosulfuron controlled grassy weeds by 85–90%.

Treatment
fenoxaprop+sulfosulfuron (4: 1 and 5: I) at 120 g ha−1e0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control of Avena ludoviciana and Phalaris minore0
Direction
controle0
Value
85–90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fenoxaprop+sulfosulfuron (4: 1 and 5: I) at 120 g ha−1 provided 85–90% control of Avena ludoviciana and Phalaris minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide mixtures controlled broadleaf weeds by 60%.

Interactor
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
control of broadleaf weedse0
Direction
controle0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“60% control of broadleaf weeds like Chenopodium album. Melilotus indica and Rumex retroflexus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No herbicide combination effectively controlled Convolvulus arvensis.

Treatment
herbicide combinationse0
Interactor
Convolvulus arvensisConvolvulus arvensise0weed
Outcome
effective against Convolvulus arvensise0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Convolvulus arvensis
Convolvulus arvensis · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of the herbicide combinations was effective against Convolvulus arvensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower clodinafop and fenoxaprop mixture doses controlled broadleaf weeds well but grassy weeds poorly.

Treatment
Clodinafop+sulfosulfuron at lower dose of 50 g ha−1e0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
good control of broadleaf weeds but poor control of grassy weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop+sulfosulfuron at lower dose of 50 g ha−1 and fenoxaprop+sulfosulfuron at 100 g ha−1 although provided good control of broadleaf weeds but poor control of grassy weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free wheat reached maximum grain yield of 5240 kg ha−1.

Treatment
weed free treatmente0
Outcome
Maximum grain yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
5240 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum grain yield (5240 kg ha−1) was obtained in weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two higher-dose mixtures gave grain yields statistically at par with weed-free wheat.

Treatment
clodinafop+sulfosulfllron (3: 1) at 60 g ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
weed free treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum grain yield (5240 kg ha−1) was obtained in weed free treatment which was at par with clodinafop+sulfosulfllron (3: 1) at 60 g ha−1 and fenoxaprop+slllfoslllfuron (4: 1 or 5: 1) at 120 g ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–114 · show in text ↑

herbicide · Convolvulus arvensis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.