Paper · 2011 · Zeitschrift für ausländische Landwirtschaft

Increasing Income of Ghanaian Cocoa Farmers: Is Introduction of Fine Flavour Cocoa a Viable Alternative

Gockowski, James; Afari-Sefa, Victor; Sarpong, Daniel Bruce; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
50
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Consumers’ taste and preference for differentiated cocoa based on darkness and flavour quality has been rising over the years. Added value of such specialty cocoa is expressed by consumers’ willingness to pay more than the standard commodity price for the attributes and associations such as augmented health benefits that differentiate the product. Conventional cocoa production systems often planted with local landraces and to some extent hybrids often have low yields that cannot match farmers’ investment decisions. An ex ante analysis of fine flavour cocoa was investigated for Ghana vis-à-vis existing farming conditions, using economic decision criteria. Fine flavour cocoa is differentiated on the basis of clonal planting material as opposed to regular pods and by its superior flavour qualities at during post-harvest handling. Results of hypothetical fine flavour systems are compared with business-as-usual systems with high input fine flavour system emerging as clear winner in terms of profitability. Sensitivity analysis shows that increasing percentage of producer price with fertiliser subsidies dramatically improves farmers’ income.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The high input fine flavour cocoa system is the clear winner in profitability over business-as-usual systems in Ghana (hypothetical systems).

Treatment
high input fine flavour systeme1
Outcome
profitabilitye1
Direction
clear winnere1
Comparator
business-as-usual systemse1
Setting
Ghanae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results of hypothetical fine flavour systems are compared with business-as-usual systems with high input fine flavour system emerging as clear winner in terms of profitability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1014 · show in text ↑
e2

“An ex ante analysis of fine flavour cocoa was investigated for Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–589 · show in text ↑
e3

“Conventional cocoa production systems often planted with local landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the producer price percentage together with fertiliser subsidies improves farmers income in sensitivity analysis.

Treatment
increasing percentage of producer price with fertiliser subsidiese4
Outcome
farmers’ incomee4
Direction
improvese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Conventional cocoa production systems often planted with local landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–422 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sensitivity analysis shows that increasing percentage of producer price with fertiliser subsidies dramatically improves farmers’ income”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1151 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Theobroma cacao (cocoa)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 36 positive, 6 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.