Paper · 1988 · Florida Entomologist

Fall Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Infestations in No-Tillage Cropping Systems

J. N. All

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments comparing no-tillage and plow-tillage practices demonstrated that infestations by the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), ultimately become similar in either cropping system. However, in certain no-tillage situations where high mulch concentrations were present on the soil surface, oviposition and damage were reduced. Significantly fewer egg masses and damage were sampled on corn, Zea mays L., (3-leaf stage) while seedlings remained within no-tillage mulch. Oviposition quickly became similar to that observed in plow-tillage systems when the plants grew above the mulch canopy of no-tillage. The number of egg masses on corn older than 4 leaves was similar in either cropping system, and leaf injury at plant silking was the same. In a comparison of corn, sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench.), and soybeans (Glycine max L.), the latter crop had no damage in either tillage system while corn and sorghum were heavily infested. Efficacy of chlorpyrifos (0.56 kg [AI]/ha) for controlling fall armyworm leaf damage was similar in corn and sorghum in either cropping system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall armyworm infestations eventually became similar under no tillage and plow tillage.

Treatment
no-tillagee2
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
infestations by the fall armyworme0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
plow-tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infestations by the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), ultimately become similar in either cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–207 · show in text ↑
e1

“on corn, Zea mays L., (3-leaf stage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–445 · show in text ↑
e2

“no-tillage and plow-tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High mulch in no tillage situations reduced oviposition and damage.

Treatment
high mulch concentrationse0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae2peste0
Outcome
oviposition and damagee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in certain no-tillage situations where high mulch concentrations were present on the soil surface, oviposition and damage were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–352 · show in text ↑
e1

“on corn, Zea mays L., (3-leaf stage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–445 · show in text ↑
e2

“the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three leaf corn seedlings within no tillage mulch had significantly fewer fall armyworm egg masses and less damage.

Organ / stage
3-leaf stagee0
Treatment
no-tillage mulche0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae1peste0
Outcome
egg masses and damagee0
Direction
fewere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly fewer egg masses and damage were sampled on corn, Zea mays L., (3-leaf stage) while seedlings remained within no-tillage mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–494 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–154 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oviposition became similar to plow tillage after corn rose above the mulch canopy.

Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae2peste0
Outcome
Ovipositione0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
plow-tillage systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oviposition quickly became similar to that observed in plow-tillage systems when the plants grew above the mulch canopy of no-tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–629 · show in text ↑
e1

“on corn, Zea mays L., (3-leaf stage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–445 · show in text ↑
e2

“the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–154 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Egg mass numbers on corn older than four leaves were similar under both tillage systems.

Organ / stage
older than 4 leavese0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae1peste0
Outcome
number of egg massese0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of egg masses on corn older than 4 leaves was similar in either cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–721 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–154 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf injury at corn silking was the same in both tillage systems.

Organ / stage
plant silkinge0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae2peste0
Outcome
leaf injurye0
Direction
samee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf injury at plant silking was the same”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–768 · show in text ↑
e1

“on corn, Zea mays L., (3-leaf stage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–445 · show in text ↑
e2

“the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–154 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybeans had no fall armyworm damage in either tillage system.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae1peste0
Outcome
no damagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybeans (Glycine max L.), the latter crop had no damage in either tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–920 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–154 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn and sorghum were heavily infested with fall armyworm.

Taxon
corn and sorghumSorghumZea mays subsp. mayse0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae1peste0
Outcome
heavily infestede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn and sorghum were heavily infested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyrifos had similar efficacy against fall armyworm leaf damage across corn, sorghum, and tillage systems.

Taxon
corn and sorghumSorghumZea mays subsp. mayse0
Treatment
chlorpyrifos (0.56 kg [AI]/ha)e0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
fall armyworm leaf damagee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
either cropping systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Efficacy of chlorpyrifos (0.56 kg [AI]/ha) for controlling fall armyworm leaf damage was similar in corn and sorghum in either cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1109 · show in text ↑

chlorpyrifos · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

tillage · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.