Paper · 2001 · Journal of Entomological Research

Incidence of sorghum shoot fly and stem borer in forage sorghum grown under poplar, Populus deltoides Marsh. based agri-silviculture system

S. Babu; KK Dahiya; A. Suganthi

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sorghum as sole crop recorded higher shoot fly and stem borer incidence than sorghum intcrcropped with poplar tree. Among the two poplar tree systems, shoot fly incidence was found less in 15 × 2.5 m spacing than 10 × 2.5 m spacing but the reverse was true for stem borer. Within poplar systems the differences were not significant. HC 260 variety recorded higher number of egg and deadhearts due to shoot fly, and dead hearts, leaf injury and stem tunneling due to stem borer as compared to HC 171.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole sorghum had higher shoot fly incidence than sorghum intercropped with poplar.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Treatment
sole crope0
Interactor
shoot flye0pest
Second interactor
stem borere0pest
Outcome
shoot fly and stem borer incidencee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sorghum intcrcropped with poplar treee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum as sole crop recorded higher shoot fly and stem borer incidence than sorghum intcrcropped with poplar tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot fly incidence was lower at 15 × 2.5 m poplar spacing than 10 × 2.5 m.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
15 × 2.5 m spacinge0
Interactor
shoot flye0pest
Outcome
shoot fly incidencee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
10 × 2.5 m spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot fly incidence was found less in 15 × 2.5 m spacing than 10 × 2.5 m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–231 · show in text ↑
t0

“Incidence of sorghum shoot fly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem borer incidence showed the reverse spacing pattern, without significant differences.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
15 × 2.5 m spacinge0
Interactor
stem borere0pest
Outcome
stem borere0
Comparator
10 × 2.5 m spacinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot fly incidence was found less in 15 × 2.5 m spacing than 10 × 2.5 m spacing but the reverse was true for stem borer. Within poplar systems the differences were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–331 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum grown under poplar, Populus deltoides Marsh. based agri-silviculture system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HC 260 had more shoot fly eggs and deadhearts than HC 171.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
HC 260e0
Interactor
shoot flye0pest
Outcome
egg and deadhearts due to shoot flye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
HC 171e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HC 260 variety recorded higher number of egg and deadhearts due to shoot fly, and dead hearts, leaf injury and stem tunneling due to stem borer as compared to HC 171”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Incidence of sorghum shoot fly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HC 260 had more stem borer deadhearts, leaf injury and stem tunneling than HC 171.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
HC 260e0
Interactor
stem borere0pest
Outcome
dead hearts, leaf injury and stem tunneling due to stem borere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
HC 171e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HC 260 variety recorded higher number of egg and deadhearts due to shoot fly, and dead hearts, leaf injury and stem tunneling due to stem borer as compared to HC 171”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Incidence of sorghum shoot fly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑

intercropping · disease · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

density · disease · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.