Paper · 2008 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Effective Management of Stem Rot of Groundnut through Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens

M. Johnson; P. Narayan Reddy; D. R. B. Reddy

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The treatments involving Pseudomonas fluorescens with or without tryptophan along with and without FYM were superior in decreasing the stem rot incidence (22.8 & 25.2%). In addition, the same treatments gave increased pod yield (1441 & 1372 kg ha−1) and haulm yield (3045 & 2953 kg ha−1) besides decreasing pods left over in soil (118 & 117 kg ha−1) and leaf drop (259 & 280 kg ha−1) than other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens treatments decreased stem rot incidence in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
treatments involving Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
stem rot incidencee0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
22.8 & 25.2%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments involving Pseudomonas fluorescens with or without tryptophan along with and without FYM were superior in decreasing the stem rot incidence (22.8 & 25.2%). In addition, the same treatments gave increased pod yield (1441 & 1372 kg ha−1) and haulm yield (3045 & 2953 kg ha−1) besides decreasing pods left over in soil (118 & 117 kg ha−1) and leaf drop (259 & 280 kg ha−1) than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens treatments increased pod yield in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
treatments involving Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1441 & 1372 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments involving Pseudomonas fluorescens with or without tryptophan along with and without FYM were superior in decreasing the stem rot incidence (22.8 & 25.2%). In addition, the same treatments gave increased pod yield (1441 & 1372 kg ha−1) and haulm yield (3045 & 2953 kg ha−1) besides decreasing pods left over in soil (118 & 117 kg ha−1) and leaf drop (259 & 280 kg ha−1) than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens treatments increased haulm yield in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
treatments involving Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
haulm yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3045 & 2953 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments involving Pseudomonas fluorescens with or without tryptophan along with and without FYM were superior in decreasing the stem rot incidence (22.8 & 25.2%). In addition, the same treatments gave increased pod yield (1441 & 1372 kg ha−1) and haulm yield (3045 & 2953 kg ha−1) besides decreasing pods left over in soil (118 & 117 kg ha−1) and leaf drop (259 & 280 kg ha−1) than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens treatments decreased pods left over in soil in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
treatments involving Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pods left over in soile0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
118 & 117 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments involving Pseudomonas fluorescens with or without tryptophan along with and without FYM were superior in decreasing the stem rot incidence (22.8 & 25.2%). In addition, the same treatments gave increased pod yield (1441 & 1372 kg ha−1) and haulm yield (3045 & 2953 kg ha−1) besides decreasing pods left over in soil (118 & 117 kg ha−1) and leaf drop (259 & 280 kg ha−1) than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens treatments decreased leaf drop in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
treatments involving Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
leaf drope0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
259 & 280 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments involving Pseudomonas fluorescens with or without tryptophan along with and without FYM were superior in decreasing the stem rot incidence (22.8 & 25.2%). In addition, the same treatments gave increased pod yield (1441 & 1372 kg ha−1) and haulm yield (3045 & 2953 kg ha−1) besides decreasing pods left over in soil (118 & 117 kg ha−1) and leaf drop (259 & 280 kg ha−1) than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.