Paper · 2010 · Archiwum Ochrony Środowiska

Effect of organic fertilization on development of proteolytic bacteria and activity of proteases in the soil for cultivation of maize (Zea mays L.)

Alicja Niewiadomska; H. Sulewska; Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of this work was investigation of the growth dynamics of proteolytic bacteria and the enzymatic activity in soil for the cultivation of maize (Zea mays L.), as well as the maize yield under application of some selected organic fertilizers. Intensity and the direction of the developed changes in the soil depended on the type of applied organic fertilizer, the size of its dose introduced into the soil and on the developmental phase of the grown plant (maize). On the basis of obtained results it was found that all tested organic substances stimulated the activity of proteases. Yields of maize as raw material for silages obtained from soil fertilized with sewage sludge were similar to those obtained after the application of pig slurry and they exceeded maize yields harvested from other fertilization objects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in soil proteolytic bacteria and enzyme activity depended on organic fertilizer type, dose, and maize stage.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Organ / stage
developmental phasee0
Treatment
type of applied organic fertilizere0
Outcome
developed changes in the soile0
Qualifier
size of its dose introduced into the soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intensity and the direction of the developed changes in the soil depended on the type of applied organic fertilizer, the size of its dose introduced into the soil and on the developmental phase of the grown plant (maize).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested organic substances stimulated soil protease activity.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
all tested organic substancese0
Outcome
activity of proteasese0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all tested organic substances stimulated the activity of proteases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize silage yield with sewage sludge was similar to yield with pig slurry.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
sewage sludgee0
Outcome
Yields of maize as raw material for silagese0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
pig slurrye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of maize as raw material for silages obtained from soil fertilized with sewage sludge were similar to those obtained after the application of pig slurry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize silage yield with sewage sludge exceeded yield under other fertilization objects.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
sewage sludgee0
Outcome
Yields of maize as raw material for silagese0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
other fertilization objectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of maize as raw material for silages obtained from soil fertilized with sewage sludge were similar to those obtained after the application of pig slurry and they exceeded maize yields harvested from other fertilization objects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize silage yield with pig slurry exceeded yield under other fertilizer treatments.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
pig slurrye0
Outcome
maize yieldse0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
other fertilization objectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of pig slurry and they exceeded maize yields harvested from other fertilization objects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–147 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.