Paper · 2012 · Annals of Applied Biology

Physiological and yield responses of recombinant chromosome substitution lines of barley to terminal drought in a Mediterranean‐type environment

A. del Pozo; D. Castillo; L. Inostroza; et al.

18
claims
40
verbatim quotes
32
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Physiological traits and productivity of the recombinant chromosome substitution lines ( RCSLs ) of barley, developed through the cross of Hordeum vulgare ssp. v ulgare cv. Harrington and the wild ancestor Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum , were measured in plants growing in microplots (with and without irrigation) and in field conditions in two M editerranean‐type environments, C auquenes (rainfed) and S anta R osa (irrigated). The objectives were to assess the degree of phenotypic variability in response to terminal drought stress and to test whether the introgression of the wild ancestor into cv. Harrington can increase the terminal drought tolerance of RCSLs of barley. Days from emergence to anthesis and from anthesis to maturity of the 80 RCSLs were reduced in only 2–4 days under water stress, in microplots. Specific leaf area ( SLA ) and stomatal conductance ( gs ) of 80 RCSLs and cv. Harrington decreased greatly under water stress in plants growing in microplots and field conditions (in 2004/05 growing season). No G × E interaction was detected except for SLA in the microplot experiment. The principal component analysis provided a clear distinction between RCSLs . Along the first principal component, it was possible to identify 24 RCSLs which represent the whole range of grain yield ( GY ), gs and SLA observed in the 80 RCSLs . The selected 24 RCSLs were evaluated in field conditions at C auquenes and S anta R osa, during two growing seasons (2007/08 and 2008/09). The gs and carbon isotope discrimination in grains (Δ 13 C ) were significantly ( P < 0.001) lower in the rainfed condition ( C auquenes), but the water‐soluble carbohydrates ( WSC ) in stems at anthesis and maturity was significantly ( P < 0.001) higher than in well‐irrigated condition ( S anta R osa). Grain yield was reduced by 63% under drought conditions. Differences between RCSLs in gs, WSC and GY were significant ( P < 0.001) in 2007/08. The stress tolerance index ( STI ) was highly ( P < 0.01) correlated with GY in all environments (rainfed and irrigated conditions and the two growing seasons). The relationship between STI and Δ 13 C under rainfed condition allowed identifying drought tolerant and susceptible RCSLs ; the former were high yielding lines under rainfed and irrigated conditions (and higher STI values), but with similar GY to cv. Harrington, but presented higher grain Δ 13 C values than cv. Harrington. The drought susceptible lines presented lower GY , STI and Δ 13 C values than cv. Harrington. These results suggest that H. spontaneum has contributed alleles that increase terminal drought tolerance to some of the RCSLs .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress shortened emergence-to-anthesis and anthesis-to-maturity intervals by 2–4 days.

Material
RCSLse0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
Days from emergence to anthesis and from anthesis to maturitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2–4 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Days from emergence to anthesis and from anthesis to maturity of the 80 RCSLs were reduced in only 2–4 days under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–807 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area decreased under water stress.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
Specific leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Specific leaf area ( SLA ) and stomatal conductance ( gs ) of 80 RCSLs and cv. Harrington decreased greatly under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–950 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance decreased under water stress.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Specific leaf area ( SLA ) and stomatal conductance ( gs ) of 80 RCSLs and cv. Harrington decreased greatly under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–950 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype-by-environment interaction was detected only for specific leaf area in microplots.

Outcome
G × E interactione0
Qualifier
except for SLA in the microplot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No G × E interaction was detected except for SLA in the microplot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1109 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Principal component analysis distinguished the barley substitution lines.

Outcome
clear distinction between RCSLse0
Comparator
RCSLse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“principal component analysis provided a clear distinction between RCSLs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1186 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first component identified 24 lines spanning the observed range of yield, conductance and leaf area.

Outcome
whole range of grain yield ( GY ), gs and SLAe0
Value
24 RCSLse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“identify 24 RCSLs which represent the whole range of grain yield ( GY ), gs and SLA observed in the 80 RCSLs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1353 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed conditions lowered stomatal conductance relative to irrigated conditions.

Treatment
rainfed conditione0
Outcome
gse0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
C auquenese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gs and carbon isotope discrimination in grains (Δ 13 C ) were significantly ( P < 0.001) lower in the rainfed condition ( C auquenes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1632 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed conditions lowered grain carbon isotope discrimination.

Treatment
rainfed conditione0
Outcome
carbon isotope discrimination in grainse0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
C auquenese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gs and carbon isotope discrimination in grains (Δ 13 C ) were significantly ( P < 0.001) lower in the rainfed condition ( C auquenes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1632 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed conditions increased stem water-soluble carbohydrates at anthesis and maturity.

Treatment
rainfed conditione1
Outcome
water‐soluble carbohydrates ( WSC ) in stems at anthesis and maturitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
well‐irrigated conditione0
Setting
S anta R osae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water‐soluble carbohydrates ( WSC ) in stems at anthesis and maturity was significantly ( P < 0.001) higher than in well‐irrigated condition ( S anta R osa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1642–1798 · show in text ↑
e1

“rainfed condition ( C auquenes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1632 · show in text ↑
e2

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced grain yield by 63%.

Treatment
drought conditionse0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
63%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was reduced by 63% under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–1855 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Substitution lines differed significantly in conductance, carbohydrates and yield in 2007/08.

Outcome
Differences between RCSLs in gs, WSC and GYe0
Qualifier
2007/08e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences between RCSLs in gs, WSC and GY were significant ( P < 0.001) in 2007/08”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1857–1941 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress tolerance index correlated strongly with grain yield across environments.

Outcome
GYe0
Qualifier
all environmentse0
Comparator
STIe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stress tolerance index ( STI ) was highly ( P < 0.01) correlated with GY in all environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2039 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The index and carbon isotope discrimination identified drought-tolerant and susceptible lines.

Outcome
identifying drought tolerant and susceptible RCSLse0
Comparator
STI and Δ 13 Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relationship between STI and Δ 13 C under rainfed condition allowed identifying drought tolerant and susceptible RCSLs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2108–2226 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-tolerant lines yielded highly in both rainfed and irrigated conditions and had higher index values.

Material
RCSLse1
Outcome
high yielding linese0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the former were high yielding lines under rainfed and irrigated conditions (and higher STI values)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2229–2327 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought tolerant and susceptible RCSLs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2188–2226 · show in text ↑
e2

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-tolerant lines had similar yield to Harrington.

Material
RCSLse1
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
cv. Harringtone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar GY to cv. Harrington”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2338–2366 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought tolerant and susceptible RCSLs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2188–2226 · show in text ↑
e2

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-tolerant lines had higher grain carbon isotope discrimination than Harrington.

Material
RCSLse1
Outcome
grain Δ 13 C valuese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
cv. Harringtone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher grain Δ 13 C values than cv. Harrington”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2382–2428 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought tolerant and susceptible RCSLs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2188–2226 · show in text ↑
e2

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-susceptible lines had lower yield, index and carbon isotope discrimination than Harrington.

Material
drought susceptible linese0
Outcome
GY , STI and Δ 13 C valuese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
cv. Harringtone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought susceptible lines presented lower GY , STI and Δ 13 C values than cv. Harrington”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2434–2522 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Wild barley alleles may have increased drought tolerance in some lines.

Gene
allelese0
Outcome
terminal drought tolerancee0
Qualifier
some of the RCSLse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H. spontaneum has contributed alleles that increase terminal drought tolerance to some of the RCSLs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2551–2650 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCSLs ) of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 2 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

drought · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 9 positive, 93 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

drought · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 15 positive, 90 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.