Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Tillage and residue management for organic carbon sequestration in coconut (Cocos nucifera)-based cropping systems

B. SUDHA; ANNAMMA GEORGE

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out on a garden land clay loam soil at Vellayani, Kerala during 2004-06 to study the effect of cropping systems, residue management and tillage practices on organic carbon sequestration in soils and thereby improvement in soil properties for better growth and production of intercrops in a coconut garden. Among the different cropping systems, coconut ( Cocos nucifera)+pineapple ( Ananas comosus) cropping system maintained the highest organic carbon content of 1.30% at the end of two years, whereas the coconut + maize ( Zea mays L.) system maintained only 1.21% soil organic carbon. Surface mulching with crop residues could maintain organic carbon up to 1.37% by the end of the study, but when the residues were incorporated to soil, the soil organic carbon (SOC) status was only 1.13%. Among tillage practices, reduced till maintained 1.29% organic carbon, whereas the conventional tillage could maintain only 1.22% SOC after two years of study. Improvement in soil properties, like aggregate stability, porosity, bulk density, water-holding capacity etc was observed with the maintenance of soil organic carbon. The improvement in soil properties reflected in better yield and returns. Coco- nut + pineapple cropping system registered the highest B:C ratio of 3.61. Coconut + banana ( Musa spp.) system recorded a B:C ratio of 2.52, whereas coconut + maize recorded the lowest of 1.31. Benefit: cost ratios were better with reduced till practices (2.63) as well as surface mulching of crop residues (2.69).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coconut plus pineapple intercropping maintained the highest soil organic carbon, 1.30%, versus 1.21% under coconut plus maize.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
coconut ( Cocos nucifera)+pineapplee1
Outcome
organic carbon contente1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1.30%e1
Comparator
coconut + maize ( Zea mays L.) systeme1
Setting
Vellayani, Keralae0

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out on a garden land clay loam soil at Vellayani, Kerala during 2004-06 to study the effect of cropping systems, residue management and tillage practices on organic carbon sequestration in soils and thereby improvement in soil properties for better growth and production of intercrops in a coconut garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–335 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the different cropping systems, coconut ( Cocos nucifera)+pineapple ( Ananas comosus) cropping system maintained the highest organic carbon content of 1.30% at the end of two years, whereas the coconut + maize ( Zea mays L.) system maintained only 1.21% soil organic carbon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface mulching with crop residues maintained soil organic carbon up to 1.37%, higher than incorporation of residues.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
Surface mulching with crop residuese2
Outcome
organic carbone2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
1.37%e2
Comparator
residues were incorporated to soile2

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out on a garden land clay loam soil at Vellayani, Kerala during 2004-06 to study the effect of cropping systems, residue management and tillage practices on organic carbon sequestration in soils and thereby improvement in soil properties for better growth and production of intercrops in a coconut garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–335 · show in text ↑
e2

“Surface mulching with crop residues could maintain organic carbon up to 1.37% by the end of the study, but when the residues were incorporated to soil, the soil organic carbon (SOC) status was only 1.13%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporating crop residues into the soil gave lower soil organic carbon status, 1.13%.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
residues were incorporated to soile2
Outcome
soil organic carbon (SOC) statuse2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
1.13%e2
Comparator
Surface mulching with crop residuese2

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out on a garden land clay loam soil at Vellayani, Kerala during 2004-06 to study the effect of cropping systems, residue management and tillage practices on organic carbon sequestration in soils and thereby improvement in soil properties for better growth and production of intercrops in a coconut garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–335 · show in text ↑
e2

“Surface mulching with crop residues could maintain organic carbon up to 1.37% by the end of the study, but when the residues were incorporated to soil, the soil organic carbon (SOC) status was only 1.13%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage maintained organic carbon at 1.29%, higher than conventional tillage at 1.22%.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
reduced tille3
Outcome
organic carbone3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
1.29%e3
Comparator
conventional tillagee3

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out on a garden land clay loam soil at Vellayani, Kerala during 2004-06 to study the effect of cropping systems, residue management and tillage practices on organic carbon sequestration in soils and thereby improvement in soil properties for better growth and production of intercrops in a coconut garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–335 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among tillage practices, reduced till maintained 1.29% organic carbon, whereas the conventional tillage could maintain only 1.22% SOC after two years of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–981 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil properties improved with maintenance of soil organic carbon.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
maintenance of soil organic carbone4
Outcome
soil propertiese4
Direction
higherinferrede4

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out on a garden land clay loam soil at Vellayani, Kerala during 2004-06 to study the effect of cropping systems, residue management and tillage practices on organic carbon sequestration in soils and thereby improvement in soil properties for better growth and production of intercrops in a coconut garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–335 · show in text ↑
e4

“Improvement in soil properties, like aggregate stability, porosity, bulk density, water-holding capacity etc was observed with the maintenance of soil organic carbon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1148 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improvement in soil properties was reflected in better yield and returns.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
improvement in soil propertiese5
Outcome
yield and returnse5
Direction
bettere5

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out on a garden land clay loam soil at Vellayani, Kerala during 2004-06 to study the effect of cropping systems, residue management and tillage practices on organic carbon sequestration in soils and thereby improvement in soil properties for better growth and production of intercrops in a coconut garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–335 · show in text ↑
e5

“The improvement in soil properties reflected in better yield and returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coconut plus pineapple cropping system had the highest benefit-cost ratio, 3.61.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
pineapple cropping systeme6
Outcome
B:C ratioe6
Direction
higheste6
Value
3.61e6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out on a garden land clay loam soil at Vellayani, Kerala during 2004-06 to study the effect of cropping systems, residue management and tillage practices on organic carbon sequestration in soils and thereby improvement in soil properties for better growth and production of intercrops in a coconut garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–335 · show in text ↑
e6

“Coco- nut + pineapple cropping system registered the highest B:C ratio of 3.61”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coconut plus banana system recorded a benefit-cost ratio of 2.52.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
Coconut + banana ( Musa spp.) systeme7
Outcome
B:C ratioe7
Value
2.52e7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out on a garden land clay loam soil at Vellayani, Kerala during 2004-06 to study the effect of cropping systems, residue management and tillage practices on organic carbon sequestration in soils and thereby improvement in soil properties for better growth and production of intercrops in a coconut garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–335 · show in text ↑
e7

“Coconut + banana ( Musa spp.) system recorded a B:C ratio of 2.52”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coconut plus maize recorded the lowest benefit-cost ratio, 1.31.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
coconut + maizee1
Outcome
B:C ratioe7
Direction
loweste1
Value
1.31e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out on a garden land clay loam soil at Vellayani, Kerala during 2004-06 to study the effect of cropping systems, residue management and tillage practices on organic carbon sequestration in soils and thereby improvement in soil properties for better growth and production of intercrops in a coconut garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–335 · show in text ↑
e7

“Coconut + banana ( Musa spp.) system recorded a B:C ratio of 2.52”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1369 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas coconut + maize recorded the lowest of 1.31”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit-cost ratio was better with reduced tillage, 2.63.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
reduced till practicese1
Outcome
cost ratiose1
Direction
bettere1
Value
2.63e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out on a garden land clay loam soil at Vellayani, Kerala during 2004-06 to study the effect of cropping systems, residue management and tillage practices on organic carbon sequestration in soils and thereby improvement in soil properties for better growth and production of intercrops in a coconut garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–335 · show in text ↑
e1

“Benefit: cost ratios were better with reduced till practices (2.63) as well as surface mulching of crop residues (2.69)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit-cost ratio was better with surface mulching of crop residues, 2.69.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
surface mulching of crop residuese1
Outcome
cost ratiose1
Direction
bettere1
Value
2.69e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out on a garden land clay loam soil at Vellayani, Kerala during 2004-06 to study the effect of cropping systems, residue management and tillage practices on organic carbon sequestration in soils and thereby improvement in soil properties for better growth and production of intercrops in a coconut garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–335 · show in text ↑
e1

“Benefit: cost ratios were better with reduced till practices (2.63) as well as surface mulching of crop residues (2.69)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1543 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mulching · yield · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.