Paper · 2000 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Effect of humidity and nutrient feed K/Ca ratio on physiological responses and the accumulation of dry matter, Ca and K in tomato

B. J. Mulholland; M. Fussell; R. N. Edmondson; et al.

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryTwo levels of humidity, high, 0.1 kPa vapour pressure deficit (vpd) and control 0.5 kPa vpd, and four nutrient feed K/Ca mM ratios (4/7, 10/7, 4/2 and 10/2) were applied in all factorial combinations to a nine-week old tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) crop for 63 d. The effect on gas exchange, water relations, vegetative growth, yield and accumulation of Ca and K in the shoot was examined. High humidity had a deleterious effect on leaf expansion, delayed truss and fruit maturity and reduced fruit yield. Water uptake was reduced and the Ca concentration of leaf and fruit tissue was increased under high humidity compared with plants grown under control humidity; K accumulation was unaffected. The accumulation of K and Ca in the shoot appeared to be poorly related to the rate of transpiration. The high (10/2 mM) K/Ca ratio nutrient feed had little effect on vegetative growth and yield compared with the low (4/7 mM), but restricted Ca uptake to the fruits at both the high and the control humidity. During the measurement period, 0900–1300 hours, stomatal conductance and leaf water status remained high at elevated humidity, compared with a progressive reduction in leaf water status and low stomatal conductance in the control humidity. A/ci gas exchange analysis where A is the net CO2 assimilation rate and ci is the intercellular partial pressure of CO2 suggested that, at high humidity, the photosynthetic capacity of the leaves was reduced because of a lower in vivo carboxylation efficiency. However, the mechanism(s) responsible for reduced leaf expansion remains unclear. The complex interrelations between physiological responses, leaf expansion and the uptake and distribution of K and Ca to the shoot, are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity impaired tomato leaf expansion.

Treatment
High humiditye0
Outcome
leaf expansione0
Direction
deleteriouse0
Comparator
control 0.5 kPa vpde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“High humidity had a deleterious effect on leaf expansion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–462 · show in text ↑
e1

“control 0.5 kPa vpd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity delayed tomato truss and fruit maturity.

Treatment
High humiditye0
Outcome
truss and fruit maturitye0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
control 0.5 kPa vpde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“High humidity had a deleterious effect on leaf expansion, delayed truss and fruit maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–496 · show in text ↑
e1

“control 0.5 kPa vpd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity reduced tomato fruit yield.

Treatment
High humiditye0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control 0.5 kPa vpde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“High humidity had a deleterious effect on leaf expansion, delayed truss and fruit maturity and reduced fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–520 · show in text ↑
e1

“control 0.5 kPa vpd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity reduced tomato water uptake.

Treatment
high humiditye0
Outcome
Water uptakee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control humiditye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“Water uptake was reduced and the Ca concentration of leaf and fruit tissue was increased under high humidity compared with plants grown under control humidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity increased calcium concentration in tomato leaf and fruit tissue.

Treatment
high humiditye0
Outcome
Ca concentration of leaf and fruit tissuee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control humiditye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Ca concentration of leaf and fruit tissue was increased under high humidity compared with plants grown under control humidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humidity left tomato potassium accumulation unaffected.

Treatment
high humiditye1
Outcome
K accumulatione0
Direction
unaffectede0
Comparator
control humiditye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“K accumulation was unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–711 · show in text ↑
e1

“under high humidity compared with plants grown under control humidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–680 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot potassium and calcium accumulation were poorly related to transpiration rate.

Organ / stage
shoote0
Outcome
accumulation of K and Ca in the shoote0
Qualifier
poorly related to the rate of transpiratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“The accumulation of K and Ca in the shoot appeared to be poorly related to the rate of transpiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A high K/Ca feed ratio had little effect on vegetative growth relative to a low ratio.

Treatment
high (10/2 mM) K/Ca ratio nutrient feede0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
little effecte0
Comparator
low (4/7 mM)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“The high (10/2 mM) K/Ca ratio nutrient feed had little effect on vegetative growth and yield compared with the low (4/7 mM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–938 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A high K/Ca feed ratio had little effect on yield relative to a low ratio.

Treatment
high (10/2 mM) K/Ca ratio nutrient feede0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
little effecte0
Comparator
low (4/7 mM)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“The high (10/2 mM) K/Ca ratio nutrient feed had little effect on vegetative growth and yield compared with the low (4/7 mM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–938 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high K/Ca ratio restricted calcium uptake into fruits under both humidity treatments.

Treatment
high (10/2 mM) K/Ca ratio nutrient feede0
Outcome
Ca uptake to the fruitse0
Direction
restrictede0
Qualifier
at both the high and the control humiditye0
Comparator
low (4/7 mM)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“The high (10/2 mM) K/Ca ratio nutrient feed had little effect on vegetative growth and yield compared with the low (4/7 mM), but restricted Ca uptake to the fruits at both the high and the control humidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At elevated humidity, tomato stomatal conductance stayed high during the measurement period.

Treatment
elevated humiditye0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
remained highe0
Qualifier
0900–1300 hourse0
Comparator
control humiditye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“During the measurement period, 0900–1300 hours, stomatal conductance and leaf water status remained high at elevated humidity, compared with a progressive reduction in leaf water status and low stomatal conductance in the control humidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At elevated humidity, tomato leaf water status stayed high while declining progressively under control humidity.

Treatment
elevated humiditye0
Outcome
leaf water statuse0
Direction
remained highe0
Qualifier
0900–1300 hourse0
Comparator
control humiditye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“During the measurement period, 0900–1300 hours, stomatal conductance and leaf water status remained high at elevated humidity, compared with a progressive reduction in leaf water status and low stomatal conductance in the control humidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1260 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gas exchange analysis suggested reduced photosynthetic capacity at high humidity due to lower in vivo carboxylation efficiency.

Treatment
high humiditye0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacity of the leavese0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
lower in vivo carboxylation efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“at high humidity, the photosynthetic capacity of the leaves was reduced because of a lower in vivo carboxylation efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1521 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

53 papers: 43 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

calcium atom · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

60 papers: 54 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

calcium atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

79 papers: 67 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

humidity · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

humidity · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

humidity · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

humidity · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 5 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

humidity · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 10 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.