Paper · 2009 · Irriga

RESPONSE OF WATERMELON TO NITROGEN FERTIGATION

Aderson Soares de Andrade Júnior; Cláudio Ricardo da Silva; Nildo Da Silva Dias; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

RESPONSE OF WATERMELON TO NITROGEN FERTIGATION Aderson Soares de Andrade Júnior1; Cláudio Ricardo da Silva2; Nildo da Silva Dias3, Braz Henrique Nunes Rodrigues1; Valdenir Queiroz Ribeiro11Embrapa Meio-Norte - Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Meio-Norte, Teresina, PI, aderson@cpamn.embrapa.br2Universidade Federal do Piauí, Campus Cinobelina Elvas, Bom Jesus, PI3 Departamento de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN 1 ABSTRACT A 2-year study was carried out during 2004-2005 at the Meio-Norte Agropecuary Brazilian Agency experimental area, located in Parnaíba, State of Piauí, Brazil, to investigate the effect of nitrogen (N) fertigation on the watermelon yield and fruit quality. The ‘Crimson Sweet’ watermelon was planted in a 2 x 1 mspacing and drip irrigated with a row of pressure-compensated drippers. Treatments consisted of five N levels (0, 40, 80, 120 and 160 kgha-1). The statistical design had randomized blocks with four replications. The total yield and marketable fruit increased with levels of N at a maximum of 66.1 and 58.4 t ha-1 with N levels of 114.6 and 112.3 kg of N ha-1, respectively. Fruit quality, represented by the total soluble solids (SST) and pH, was not affected by nitrogen levels. KEYWORDS: Citullus lanatus, drip irrigation, irrigation management ANDRADE JÚNIOR, A. S. de; SILVA, C. R. da; DIAS, N. da S.; RODRIGUES, B. H. N.; RIBEIRO, V. Q. RESPOSTA DA MELANCIEIRA A FERTIRRIGAÇÃO NITROGENADA 2 RESUMO Para investigar o efeito da aplicação de nitrogênio via fertirrigação sobre a produtividade e qualidade de frutos de melancieira irrigada por gotejamento, um experimento foi conduzido durante dois anos (2004 e 2005) na área experimental da Empresa Brasileira de Agropecuária Meio-Norte, localizada em Parnaíba, Piauí. A melancia ‘Crimson Sweet’ foi plantada no espaçamento de 2 x 1 me irrigadas por uma linha de gotejadores autocompensantes. Os tratamentos consistiram de 5 níveis de nitrogênio aplicados via fertirrigação (0, 40, 80, 120 e 160 kgha-1). O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o de blocos ao acaso com quatro repetições. A produtividade total e comercial aumentou com os níveis de N até um máximo de 66,1 e 58,4 t ha-1 com os níveis de 114,6 e 112,3 kg of N ha-1, respectivamente. A qualidade dos frutos, representada pelo teor de Sólidos Solúveis Totais (SST) e pH, não foi afetada pelos níveis de nitrogênio. UNITERMOS: Citullus lanatus, irrigação por gotejamento, manejo de irrigação.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total watermelon yield rose with N level to 66.1 t ha-1 at 114.6 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
levels of Ne0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
66.1e0
Qualifier
114.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“The total yield and marketable fruit increased with levels of N at a maximum of 66.1 and 58.4 t ha-1 with N levels of 114.6 and 112.3 kg of N ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable watermelon fruit yield rose with N level to 58.4 t ha-1 at 112.3 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
levels of Ne0
Outcome
marketable fruite0
Direction
increasede0
Value
58.4 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
112.3 kg of N ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“The total yield and marketable fruit increased with levels of N at a maximum of 66.1 and 58.4 t ha-1 with N levels of 114.6 and 112.3 kg of N ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N levels did not affect watermelon total soluble solids or pH.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
total soluble solids (SST) and pHe0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit quality, represented by the total soluble solids (SST) and pH, was not affected by nitrogen levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1258 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.