Abstract
Nutrients deficiency in the soils is one of the key factors limiting pulses production in arid and semi-arid regions. Responses of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars (Jam from Kabuli type and Pirooz from Desi type) to Biosuper (The mixture of Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Basillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens) inoculation as bio-fertilizer and micro-nutrient (FeEDDHA and ZnSO4) fertilization were studied under field condition. Result revealed that micro-nutrient application could significantly improve plant height, chlorophyll index, number of primary and secondary branches, plants fresh weight and biological yield. Positive effects of micro-nutrients application on morphological traits were more predominant than bio-fertilizer inoculation. Grain yield and yield components were notably affected by investigated treatments. Micro-nutrient and bio-fertilizer had significant positive effect on number of pods, seed number per plant, number of filled and empty pods, 100-grain weight and grain yield. Nevertheless the best result was achieved through ZnSO4 application concomitant with bio-fertilizer inoculation. Future more results obtained from current study indicated that Kabuli type of chickpea was more responsive than Desi type against bio-fertilizer inoculation and micro-nutrients application. The results of the present study coincided with the conclusion that combined application of iron, zinc and bio-fertilizer can significantly improved chickpea yield in alkaline soils of semi-arid regions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Micro-nutrient application significantly improved plant height and chlorophyll index of chickpea under field conditions.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- micro-nutrient applicatione0
- Outcome
- plant height, chlorophyll indexe0
- Direction
- improvee0
- Setting
- field conditione1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars”
e0“Result revealed that micro-nutrient application could significantly improve plant height, chlorophyll index, number of primary and secondary branches, plants fresh weight and biological yield”
e1“were studied under field condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Micro-nutrient application significantly improved plant fresh weight and biological yield of chickpea under field conditions.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- micro-nutrient applicatione0
- Outcome
- plants fresh weight and biological yielde0
- Direction
- improvee0
- Setting
- field conditione1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars”
e0“Result revealed that micro-nutrient application could significantly improve plant height, chlorophyll index, number of primary and secondary branches, plants fresh weight and biological yield”
e1“were studied under field condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Micro-nutrient application significantly improved the number of primary and secondary branches of chickpea under field conditions.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- micro-nutrient applicatione0
- Outcome
- number of primary and secondary branchese0
- Direction
- improvee0
- Setting
- field conditione1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars”
e0“Result revealed that micro-nutrient application could significantly improve plant height, chlorophyll index, number of primary and secondary branches, plants fresh weight and biological yield”
e1“were studied under field condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Positive effects of micro-nutrient application on morphological traits of chickpea were more predominant than those of bio-fertilizer inoculation.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- micro-nutrients applicatione2
- Outcome
- morphological traitse2
- Direction
- more predominante2
- Comparator
- bio-fertilizer inoculatione2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars”
e2“Positive effects of micro-nutrients application on morphological traits were more predominant than bio-fertilizer inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
The best chickpea result was achieved with ZnSO4 application combined with bio-fertilizer inoculation.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- ZnSO4 application concomitant with bio-fertilizer inoculatione3
- Outcome
- best resulte3
- Direction
- beste3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars”
e3“Nevertheless the best result was achieved through ZnSO4 application concomitant with bio-fertilizer inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Micro-nutrient and bio-fertilizer significantly and positively affected number of pods, seed number per plant and number of filled and empty pods.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Micro-nutrient and bio-fertilizere4
- Outcome
- number of pods, seed number per plant, number of filled and empty podse4
- Direction
- positivee4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars”
e4“Micro-nutrient and bio-fertilizer had significant positive effect on number of pods, seed number per plant, number of filled and empty pods, 100-grain weight and grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Micro-nutrient and bio-fertilizer significantly and positively affected 100-grain weight and grain yield of chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Micro-nutrient and bio-fertilizere4
- Outcome
- 100-grain weight and grain yielde4
- Direction
- positivee4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars”
e4“Micro-nutrient and bio-fertilizer had significant positive effect on number of pods, seed number per plant, number of filled and empty pods, 100-grain weight and grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
The Kabuli chickpea type was more responsive than the Desi type to bio-fertilizer inoculation and micro-nutrient application.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume5
- Material
- Kabuli typee5
- Treatment
- bio-fertilizer inoculation and micro-nutrients applicatione5
- Outcome
- responsivee5
- Direction
- more responsivee5
- Comparator
- Desi typee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Kabuli type of chickpea was more responsive than Desi type against bio-fertilizer inoculation and micro-nutrients application”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined application of iron, zinc and bio-fertilizer can significantly improve chickpea yield in alkaline soils of semi-arid regions.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume6
- Treatment
- combined application of iron, zinc and bio-fertilizere6
- Outcome
- chickpea yielde6
- Direction
- improvede6
- Setting
- alkaline soils of semi-arid regionse6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“combined application of iron, zinc and bio-fertilizer can significantly improved chickpea yield in alkaline soils of semi-arid regions”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
67 papers more in this group
See all 71 papers →iron atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →micronutrient · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
213 papers more in this group
See all 217 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.