Abstract
ABSTRACT: Pot experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of saline irrigations on five varieties of tomato (4, 22, 38, 46 & 54). Plants were irrigated with diluted seawater adjusted to three levels of electrical conductivity; freshwater (control), 3, and 6 dS m -1 . The results of the experiment showed that saline waters remarkably affected the evapotranspiration rate, soil moisture, salts accumulation and plant biomass production. Saline irrigation had the ability to keep much water in the soil with higher level of salt content. Low salinity treatment exhibited highest plant growth and lowest soil moisture and salts deposition. Varieties number 38 and 46 gave the highest values for fruits number and weight. Whereas, variety number 22 got the lowest values. However, variety number 4 was the tallest and had the highest value for green matter even under high salinity treatment. Overall, under saline condition it was observed that all plant parameters of different varieties were reduced compared to the control except for the number of fruits of some varieties such as 38, 46 and 54. However fruit weight for variety number 38 was enhanced by saline irrigation which could be a good sign for salt tolerance in saline conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Under saline irrigation all plant parameters of tomato varieties were reduced compared with the control, except fruit number of some varieties.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- saline conditione1
- Outcome
- plant parameterse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Qualifier
- except for the number of fruits of some varieties such as 38, 46 and 54e1
- Comparator
- controle1
- Setting
- Pot experimentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pot experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of saline irrigations on five varieties of tomato”
e1“under saline condition it was observed that all plant parameters of different varieties were reduced compared to the control except for the number of fruits of some varieties such as 38, 46 and 54”
Claim · model-written summary
Low salinity treatment gave the highest plant growth in tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Low salinity treatmente2
- Outcome
- plant growthe2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Setting
- Pot experimentse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pot experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of saline irrigations on five varieties of tomato”
e2“Low salinity treatment exhibited highest plant growth and lowest soil moisture and salts deposition”
Claim · model-written summary
Low salinity treatment gave the lowest soil moisture and salts deposition in tomato pots.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Low salinity treatmente2
- Outcome
- soil moisture and salts depositione2
- Direction
- loweste2
- Setting
- Pot experimentse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pot experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of saline irrigations on five varieties of tomato”
e2“Low salinity treatment exhibited highest plant growth and lowest soil moisture and salts deposition”
Claim · model-written summary
Saline waters affected the evapotranspiration rate, soil moisture and salt accumulation of tomato pots.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- saline waterse3
- Outcome
- evapotranspiration rate, soil moisture, salts accumulatione3
- Setting
- Pot experimentse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pot experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of saline irrigations on five varieties of tomato”
e3“saline waters remarkably affected the evapotranspiration rate, soil moisture, salts accumulation and plant biomass production”
Claim · model-written summary
Saline waters affected plant biomass production of tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- saline waterse3
- Outcome
- plant biomass productione3
- Setting
- Pot experimentse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pot experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of saline irrigations on five varieties of tomato”
e3“saline waters remarkably affected the evapotranspiration rate, soil moisture, salts accumulation and plant biomass production”
Claim · model-written summary
Saline irrigation kept more water in the soil of tomato pots.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Saline irrigatione4
- Outcome
- water in the soile4
- Direction
- keep muche4
- Qualifier
- with higher level of salt contente4
- Setting
- Pot experimentse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pot experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of saline irrigations on five varieties of tomato”
e4“Saline irrigation had the ability to keep much water in the soil with higher level of salt content”
Claim · model-written summary
Saline irrigation raised salt content in the soil of tomato pots.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Saline irrigatione4
- Outcome
- salt contente4
- Direction
- highere4
- Setting
- Pot experimentse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pot experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of saline irrigations on five varieties of tomato”
e4“Saline irrigation had the ability to keep much water in the soil with higher level of salt content”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato varieties number 38 and 46 gave the highest fruit number and fruit weight.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Material
- Varieties number 38 and 46e5
- Outcome
- fruits number and weighte5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Setting
- Pot experimentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pot experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of saline irrigations on five varieties of tomato”
e5“Varieties number 38 and 46 gave the highest values for fruits number and weight. Whereas, variety number 22 got the lowest values”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato variety number 22 gave the lowest fruit number and fruit weight.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Material
- variety number 22e5
- Outcome
- fruits number and weighte5
- Direction
- loweste5
- Setting
- Pot experimentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pot experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of saline irrigations on five varieties of tomato”
e5“Varieties number 38 and 46 gave the highest values for fruits number and weight. Whereas, variety number 22 got the lowest values”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato variety number 4 had the highest green matter under high salinity treatment.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Material
- variety number 4e6
- Treatment
- high salinity treatmente6
- Outcome
- green mattere6
- Direction
- higheste6
- Setting
- Pot experimentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pot experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of saline irrigations on five varieties of tomato”
e6“variety number 4 was the tallest and had the highest value for green matter even under high salinity treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato variety number 4 was the tallest under high salinity treatment.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Material
- variety number 4e6
- Treatment
- high salinity treatmente6
- Outcome
- talleste6
- Setting
- Pot experimentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pot experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of saline irrigations on five varieties of tomato”
e6“variety number 4 was the tallest and had the highest value for green matter even under high salinity treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Saline irrigation enhanced fruit weight of tomato variety number 38.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Material
- variety number 38e7
- Treatment
- saline irrigatione7
- Outcome
- fruit weighte7
- Direction
- enhancede7
- Setting
- Pot experimentse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pot experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of saline irrigations on five varieties of tomato”
e7“fruit weight for variety number 38 was enhanced by saline irrigation”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 141 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
156 papers more in this group
See all 160 papers →salinity · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 261 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
296 papers more in this group
See all 300 papers →irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
238 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
340 papers more in this group
See all 344 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.