Paper · 1972

Effect of crop rotation on physical and chemical properties of soil and their effects on yield of jowar and cotton

G. Hunisgi; B. N. Patil

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of cotton-jowar and cotton-jowar-groundnut rotations maintained for 22 years on a clay soil were studied. Application of farmyard manure at 6 t/ha, and the presence of cotton in the rotation increased the soil organic matter content. Groundnut in rotation increased soil NO3-N but not total-N. The increase in water-stable aggregates (0.25 mm) is attributed to organic matter accumulation. Application of superphosphate did not improve aggregation. Cation exchange capacity was linearly related to organic matter. Jowar yields were increased by NO3-N, but cotton yields were not related to NO3-N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure increased soil organic matter.

Taxon
jowar and cottont0
Treatment
farmyard manure at 6 t/hae0
Outcome
soil organic matter contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of farmyard manure at 6 t/ha, and the presence of cotton in the rotation increased the soil organic matter content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–245 · show in text ↑
t0

“jowar and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton in the rotation increased soil organic matter.

Treatment
presence of cotton in the rotatione0
Outcome
soil organic matter contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of farmyard manure at 6 t/ha, and the presence of cotton in the rotation increased the soil organic matter content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut in rotation increased soil NO3-N.

Taxon
jowar and cottont0
Treatment
Groundnut in rotatione0
Outcome
soil NO3-Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Groundnut in rotation increased soil NO3-N but not total-N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–305 · show in text ↑
t0

“jowar and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut in rotation did not increase soil total-N.

Taxon
jowar and cottont0
Treatment
Groundnut in rotatione0
Outcome
total-Ne0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Groundnut in rotation increased soil NO3-N but not total-N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–305 · show in text ↑
t0

“jowar and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–114 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic matter accumulation was attributed as the cause of increased water stable aggregates.

Taxon
jowar and cottont0
Outcome
increase in water-stable aggregatese0
Value
0.25 mme0
Qualifier
organic matter accumulatione0

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in water-stable aggregates (0.25 mm) is attributed to organic matter accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–401 · show in text ↑
t0

“jowar and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superphosphate did not improve soil aggregation.

Taxon
jowar and cottont0
Treatment
superphosphatee0
Outcome
aggregatione0
Direction
did not improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of superphosphate did not improve aggregation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–460 · show in text ↑
t0

“jowar and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–114 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cation exchange capacity was linearly related to organic matter.

Taxon
jowar and cottont0
Outcome
Cation exchange capacitye0
Comparator
organic mattere0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Cation exchange capacity was linearly related to organic matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“jowar and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–114 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield was unrelated to NO3-N.

Compound
NO3-Ne0
Outcome
yieldse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton yields were not related to NO3-N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–607 · show in text ↑

rotation · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.