Paper · 1999 · 12th Australian Weeds Conference, Papers and Proceedings, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 12-16 September 1999: Weed management into the 21st century: do we know where we're going?

Increased crop density reduces weed seed production without increasing screenings.

S. Peltzer; A. C. Bishop; M. Boersma; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Results from a series of related field trials confirm that Western Australian crop varieties do not increase screenings with increased seeding rates contrary to the general belief held by farmers. This has management implications for weed control as increasing the crop density can substantially reduce weed growth and seed production in the absence of in-crop herbicides. In one trial, seeding rates of up to 400 kg ha of 4 cereals (oats, barley, wheat and triticale) were investigated as a management tool to control annual ryegrass and wild radish. All 4 cereals were successful in reducing weed seed production to manageable levels at high seeding rates. The yields of both wheat and triticale decreased when seeding rates increased, due to the extremely dry finish to the season in 1998, but only triticale increased screenings. The earlier maturing oats and barley were unaffected. Other trials investigating seeding rates and/or seeding pattern and row spacing with different varieties of wheat have corroborated the uniformity of screenings with seeding density.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Western Australian crop varieties did not show increased screenings with increased seeding rates.

Taxon
crop varietiese0
Treatment
increased seeding ratese0
Outcome
screeningse0
Direction
do not increasee0
Setting
Western Australiane0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Western Australian crop varieties do not increase screenings with increased seeding rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High seeding rates reduced weed seed production to manageable levels in all four cereals (oats, barley, wheat, triticale).

Taxon
4 cerealse0
Treatment
high seeding ratese0
Outcome
weed seed productione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All 4 cereals were successful in reducing weed seed production to manageable levels at high seeding rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing crop density can substantially reduce weed growth and weed seed production in the absence of in-crop herbicides.

Taxon
crope0
Treatment
increasing the crop densitye0
Outcome
weed growth and seed productione0
Direction
reducee0
Qualifier
in the absence of in-crop herbicidese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the crop density can substantially reduce weed growth and seed production in the absence of in-crop herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield decreased when seeding rates increased, attributed to the extremely dry finish to the 1998 season.

Treatment
seeding rates increasede0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
extremely dry finish to the season in 1998e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of both wheat and triticale decreased when seeding rates increased, due to the extremely dry finish to the season in 1998”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale yield decreased when seeding rates increased, attributed to the extremely dry finish to the 1998 season.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
seeding rates increasede0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
extremely dry finish to the season in 1998e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of both wheat and triticale decreased when seeding rates increased, due to the extremely dry finish to the season in 1998”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–791 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only triticale, and not the other cereals, showed increased screenings.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
screeningse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but only triticale increased screenings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–832 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oats were unaffected with respect to screenings.

Outcome
unaffectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The earlier maturing oats and barley were unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–886 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley was unaffected with respect to screenings.

Outcome
unaffectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The earlier maturing oats and barley were unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–886 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other trials with different wheat varieties, seeding rates, seeding patterns and row spacings corroborated the uniformity of screenings across seeding density.

Outcome
uniformity of screeningse0
Qualifier
seeding pattern and row spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Other trials investigating seeding rates and/or seeding pattern and row spacing with different varieties of wheat have corroborated the uniformity of screenings with seeding density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1069 · show in text ↑

density · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 376 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.