Abstract
Abstract Rest of ‘Delicious’ apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) buds was satisfied partially by applications of 6-ben-zylamino purine + gibberellic acid (BA+GA 4+7 = Promalin), BA alone, potassium nitrate, and thiourea; GA 4+7 alone had no effect. The combination of thiourea and potassium nitrate was as effective as Promalin or BA in stimulating flower bud development. Potassium nitrate had a pronounced effect on forcing flower buds while thiourea had more effect on forcing vegetative buds. BA and Promalin affected both flower and vegetative buds. No treatment affected bloom date or growing degree hours (GDH) required for flower bud expansion under our conditions when applied after 450, 950, or 1200 hours of chilling. Promalin and BA were both effective at 300 and 500 ppm, while thiourea and potassium nitrate were effective at 2% and 3% (w/v), respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Promalin partially satisfied the rest requirement of Delicious apple buds.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- Promaline0
- Outcome
- Reste1
- Direction
- satisfied partiallye1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Leaf and Flower Buds”
e1“Rest of ‘Delicious’ apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) buds was satisfied partially”
e0“was satisfied partially by applications of 6-ben-zylamino purine + gibberellic acid (BA+GA 4+7 = Promalin), BA alone, potassium nitrate, and thiourea”
Claim · model-written summary
BA alone partially satisfied the rest requirement of Delicious apple buds.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- BA alonee0
- Outcome
- Reste1
- Direction
- satisfied partiallye1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Leaf and Flower Buds”
e1“Rest of ‘Delicious’ apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) buds was satisfied partially”
e0“was satisfied partially by applications of 6-ben-zylamino purine + gibberellic acid (BA+GA 4+7 = Promalin), BA alone, potassium nitrate, and thiourea”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium nitrate partially satisfied the rest requirement of Delicious apple buds.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- potassium nitratee0
- Outcome
- Reste1
- Direction
- satisfied partiallye1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Leaf and Flower Buds”
e1“Rest of ‘Delicious’ apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) buds was satisfied partially”
e0“was satisfied partially by applications of 6-ben-zylamino purine + gibberellic acid (BA+GA 4+7 = Promalin), BA alone, potassium nitrate, and thiourea”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiourea partially satisfied the rest requirement of Delicious apple buds.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- thioureae0
- Outcome
- Reste1
- Direction
- satisfied partiallye1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Leaf and Flower Buds”
e1“Rest of ‘Delicious’ apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) buds was satisfied partially”
e0“was satisfied partially by applications of 6-ben-zylamino purine + gibberellic acid (BA+GA 4+7 = Promalin), BA alone, potassium nitrate, and thiourea”
Claim · model-written summary
GA 4+7 alone had no effect on the rest of Delicious apple buds.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- GA 4+7 alonee2
- Outcome
- Reste1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Leaf and Flower Buds”
e1“Rest of ‘Delicious’ apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) buds was satisfied partially”
e2“GA 4+7 alone had no effect”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination of thiourea and potassium nitrate was as effective as Promalin or BA in stimulating flower bud development.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- combination of thiourea and potassium nitratee3
- Outcome
- flower bud developmente3
- Direction
- as effective ase3
- Comparator
- Promalin or BAe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Leaf and Flower Buds”
e3“The combination of thiourea and potassium nitrate was as effective as Promalin or BA in stimulating flower bud development”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium nitrate had a pronounced effect on forcing flower buds of apple.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- Potassium nitratee4
- Outcome
- forcing flower budse4
- Direction
- pronounced effecte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Leaf and Flower Buds”
e4“Potassium nitrate had a pronounced effect on forcing flower buds while thiourea had more effect on forcing vegetative buds”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiourea had more effect on forcing vegetative buds of apple than on flower buds.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- thioureae4
- Outcome
- forcing vegetative budse4
- Direction
- more effecte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Leaf and Flower Buds”
e4“Potassium nitrate had a pronounced effect on forcing flower buds while thiourea had more effect on forcing vegetative buds”
Claim · model-written summary
No treatment affected bloom date or growing degree hours for flower bud expansion when applied after 450, 950 or 1200 hours of chilling.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- applied after 450, 950, or 1200 hours of chillinge5
- Outcome
- bloom datee5
- Qualifier
- No treatment affectede5
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Leaf and Flower Buds”
e5“No treatment affected bloom date or growing degree hours (GDH) required for flower bud expansion under our conditions when applied after 450, 950, or 1200 hours of chilling”
Claim · model-written summary
Promalin and BA were both effective at 300 and 500 ppm in apple buds.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- Promalin and BAe6
- Outcome
- effectivee6
- Value
- 300 and 500 ppme6
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Leaf and Flower Buds”
e6“Promalin and BA were both effective at 300 and 500 ppm, while thiourea and potassium nitrate were effective at 2% and 3% (w/v), respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiourea was effective at 2% (w/v) in apple buds.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- thioureae6
- Outcome
- effectivee6
- Value
- 2%e6
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Leaf and Flower Buds”
e6“Promalin and BA were both effective at 300 and 500 ppm, while thiourea and potassium nitrate were effective at 2% and 3% (w/v), respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium nitrate was effective at 3% (w/v) in apple buds.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- potassium nitratee6
- Outcome
- effectivee6
- Value
- 3%e6
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Leaf and Flower Buds”
e6“Promalin and BA were both effective at 300 and 500 ppm, while thiourea and potassium nitrate were effective at 2% and 3% (w/v), respectively”
The same questions in other papers
potassium nitrate · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.