Paper · 2014 · World Journal of Agriculture and Soil Science

Infectivity and Efficacy of Glomus fasciculatum and Acaulospora leavis on the Growth and Nutritional Factors of Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek

KOKKARANIYIL SMITHA; C. P. Sunilkumar; Rajkumar H. Garampalli

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are known to form symbiotic association with plants and provide nutrients to plants for return of carbon source. In the present study a green house experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of dual inoculation with two AMF, viz. Glomus fasciculatum and Acaulospora leavis, on growth and nutritional factors of Vigna radiata (Green gram) in sterile (st) and unsterile (ust) soil condition. The results revealed that, there was an increase in plant growth parameters like, fresh and dry weights of shoot, total nitrogen, phosphorus contents, total protein and seed soluble protein in Ust + A. leavis inoculated plants compared to the control and between the treatments. In unsterilized soil, both Glomus fasciculatum and Acaulospora leavis showed 99% colonization. Whereas, in sterilized soil Glomus fasciculatum showed 92% colonization, while Acaulospora leavis showed 95% colonization. This indicates that AMF have different colonization strategies apart from nitrogen and phosphorus contents in the soil. The results of seed storage proteins revealed that, in G. fasciculatum inoculated sterile soil, there is slightly increase in protein concentration (0.58 mg/100mg) compared to both controls (0.425 mg and 0.566 mg/100 mg). The other treatments did not show any significant increase in total soluble seed protein. The present study suggested that A. leavis may be used as bio-inoculant in sustainable agriculture to increase the yield of Green gram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual AMF inoculation with A. leavis in unsterile soil increased fresh and dry shoot weights of Vigna radiata compared with controls in a greenhouse.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Ust + A. leavis inoculatede1
Interactor
A. leavise1symbiont
Outcome
fresh and dry weights of shoote1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
green housee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“a green house experiment was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–207 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was an increase in plant growth parameters like, fresh and dry weights of shoot, total nitrogen, phosphorus contents, total protein and seed soluble protein in Ust + A. leavis inoculated plants compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual AMF inoculation with A. leavis in unsterile soil increased total nitrogen and phosphorus contents of Vigna radiata compared with controls in a greenhouse.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Ust + A. leavis inoculatede1
Interactor
A. leavise1symbiont
Outcome
total nitrogen, phosphorus contentse1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
green housee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“a green house experiment was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–207 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was an increase in plant growth parameters like, fresh and dry weights of shoot, total nitrogen, phosphorus contents, total protein and seed soluble protein in Ust + A. leavis inoculated plants compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual AMF inoculation with A. leavis in unsterile soil increased total protein and seed soluble protein of Vigna radiata compared with controls in a greenhouse.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Ust + A. leavis inoculatede1
Interactor
A. leavise1symbiont
Outcome
total protein and seed soluble proteine1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
green housee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“a green house experiment was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–207 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was an increase in plant growth parameters like, fresh and dry weights of shoot, total nitrogen, phosphorus contents, total protein and seed soluble protein in Ust + A. leavis inoculated plants compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–683 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus fasciculatum reached 99% colonization in unsterilized soil.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Interactor
Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse2symbiont
Outcome
colonizatione2
Value
99%e2
Setting
unsterilized soile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–125 · show in text ↑
e2

“In unsterilized soil, both Glomus fasciculatum and Acaulospora leavis showed 99% colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–805 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acaulospora leavis reached 99% colonization in unsterilized soil.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Interactor
Acaulospora leavise2symbiont
Outcome
colonizatione2
Value
99%e2
Setting
unsterilized soile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–125 · show in text ↑
e2

“In unsterilized soil, both Glomus fasciculatum and Acaulospora leavis showed 99% colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–805 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus fasciculatum reached 92% colonization in sterilized soil.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Interactor
Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse3symbiont
Outcome
colonizatione3
Value
92%e3
Setting
sterilized soile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–125 · show in text ↑
e3

“in sterilized soil Glomus fasciculatum showed 92% colonization, while Acaulospora leavis showed 95% colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–928 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acaulospora leavis reached 95% colonization in sterilized soil.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Interactor
Acaulospora leavise3symbiont
Outcome
colonizatione3
Value
95%e3
Setting
sterilized soile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–125 · show in text ↑
e3

“in sterilized soil Glomus fasciculatum showed 92% colonization, while Acaulospora leavis showed 95% colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus fasciculatum inoculation in sterile soil slightly increased seed protein concentration of Vigna radiata to 0.58 mg/100mg, compared with both controls.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
G. fasciculatum inoculatede4
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse4symbiont
Outcome
protein concentratione4
Direction
increasee4
Value
0.58 mg/100mge4
Qualifier
0.425 mg and 0.566 mg/100 mge4
Comparator
both controlse4
Setting
sterile soile4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–125 · show in text ↑
e4

“in G. fasciculatum inoculated sterile soil, there is slightly increase in protein concentration (0.58 mg/100mg) compared to both controls (0.425 mg and 0.566 mg/100 mg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The other AMF treatments did not significantly increase total soluble seed protein of Vigna radiata.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
other treatmentse5
Outcome
total soluble seed proteine5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–125 · show in text ↑
e5

“The other treatments did not show any significant increase in total soluble seed protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1360 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that A. leavis may be used as a bio-inoculant in sustainable agriculture to increase the yield of Vigna radiata.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
bio-inoculante6
Interactor
A. leavise6symbiont
Outcome
yielde6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–125 · show in text ↑
e6

“The present study suggested that A. leavis may be used as bio-inoculant in sustainable agriculture to increase the yield of Green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1496 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 60 positive, 1 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 118 positive, 8 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

inoculation · physiology: osmolytes · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.