Paper · 2004 · DigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University)

The Effects of Brassica Cover Crops on Weed Dynamics

Erin R. Haramoto

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Concerns about the health and environmental impacts of herbicide use have led farmers and researchers to seek alternative methods of weed management. One such alternative is the use of allelopathic cover crops, which release chemicals into the soil environment that can contribute to weed management through suppression of weed seed germination, seedling emergence and establishment, and seedling growth, in addition to providing other soil quality benefits to farmers. Brassicas, or members of the Brassicaceae, contain glucosinolates, sulfur-containing molecules that degrade to form compounds toxic to a variety of organisms. Glucosinolate content varies between brassicas grown as cover crops; mustards typically have very high glucosinolate content, whereas others, including canola and rapeseed, contain lower amounts. Brassica residues have strong phytotoxic effects; weed density and biomass has been observed to be lower in crops following incorporation of brassica residue. In addition to a literature review, this thesis describes two experiments that investigated the mechanisms behind this observed weed suppression by brassicas. The first experiment examined seedling establishment following incorporation of brassica residues and residues of other short-season cover crops. We hypothesized that all cover crop residues would decrease and delay seedling emergence compared to fallow and that emergence following the brassica residues would be lowest and slowest, particularly following the high-glucosinolate mustard. Based on the theory that smaller seeds are more susceptible to stress such as those imposed by allelopathic cover crops, we expected that smaller-seeded species would be affected more than larger-seeded ones. While average emergence was indeed lower following all of the cover crop residues compared to fallow, emergence was similar following the brassicas and following the other cover crop residues. Seed size was a poor predictor of species emergence following the cover crops. While emergence was slower following all the cover crop residues, emergence rates were generally similar between the brassicas and the other cover crops, although delayed emergence following mustard was observed in one year. The second experiment examined the effects of mustard and canola on the growth of established redroot pigweed and green bean plants and, in turn, on interspecific competition. Redroot pigweed and green bean, both alone and in mixture, were seeded into incorporated mustard and canola residues and fallow plots; plants were sampled throughout the season to assess the effects of the cover crop residues on growth. We hypothesized that growth of the smaller-seeded redroot pigweed would be harmed by the brassica residues, particularly early in the season, but that growth of the larger-seeded green bean would not be affected. In turn, we expected that the brassica residues would mediate interspecific competition, through differential effects on growth, thereby conferring a competitive edge to green bean plants growing with redroot pigweed. As expected, brassica cover crop residues did not affect green bean height, biomass, leaf area, relative growth rate, or final marketable yield. Contrary to expectations, these parameters for redroot pigweed were also unaffected. While the presence of competition reduced growth of both species, no interaction with cover crop residue was found.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop residues reduced average emergence relative to fallow.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Treatment
all of the cover crop residuese0
Outcome
average emergencee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average emergence was indeed lower following all of the cover crop residues compared to fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1841 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emergence following brassicas was similar to other cover crops.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Treatment
brassicase0
Outcome
emergencee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
other cover crop residuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“emergence was similar following the brassicas and following the other cover crop residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1843–1932 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–23 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed size poorly predicted emergence after cover crops.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Treatment
cover cropse0
Outcome
species emergencee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed size was a poor predictor of species emergence following the cover crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–2011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop residues slowed emergence.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Treatment
all the cover crop residuese0
Outcome
emergencee0
Direction
slowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“emergence was slower following all the cover crop residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2019–2077 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emergence rates were generally similar after brassicas and other cover crops.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Treatment
brassicase0
Outcome
emergence ratese0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
other cover cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“emergence rates were generally similar between the brassicas and the other cover crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2079–2165 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard delayed emergence in one year.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Treatment
mustarde0
Outcome
emergencee0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
in one yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“delayed emergence following mustard was observed in one year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2176–2236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brassica residue did not affect green bean growth traits or yield.

Taxon
green beane0
Treatment
brassica cover crop residuese0
Outcome
height, biomass, leaf areae0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“brassica cover crop residues did not affect green bean height, biomass, leaf area, relative growth rate, or final marketable yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3095–3225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redroot pigweed growth parameters were unaffected.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Interactor
redroot pigweede0weed
Outcome
parameters for redroot pigweede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these parameters for redroot pigweed were also unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3253–3310 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–23 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition reduced growth of both species.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Treatment
competitione0
Outcome
growth of both speciese0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the presence of competition reduced growth of both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3318–3376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition showed no interaction with cover crop residue.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Outcome
interaction with cover crop residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no interaction with cover crop residue was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3378–3426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–23 · show in text ↑

organic · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.