Aspergillus nidulans 3 claims

species · family Aspergillaceae · fungus · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

NCBI synonyms: Aspergillus nidulans (Eidam) G. Winter, 1884 · Aspergillus nidulellus · Emericella nidulans · Sterigmatocystis nidulans

2 spellings

Aspergillus nidulansPlasmidmap · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

3 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus nidulans had the lowest relative density, 0.55.

Taxon: A. nidulansAspergillus nidulanse0
Outcome: A. nidulanse0
Direction: loweste0
Value: 0.55e0

Verbatim

e0
“the lowest was found in case of A. nidulans (0.55)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–844

Title

Detection of Aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus Isolates in Raw Materials of Some Indian Medicinal Plants

Ashok Kumar; Sanyogita Kumari International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2022. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2022.1112.011

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation A total of 906 fungal isolates were found on medicinal plant raw materials.
Observation Terminalia arjuna had the fewest fungal isolates, 96.
Observation Boerhaavia diffusa had the most fungal isolates, 217.
Observation Aspergillus was the dominant fungal genus in every sample.
Observation Aspergillus flavus had the highest relative density, 37.19.
Observation Aspergillus niger had a relative density of 23.84.
Observation Cladosporium herbarum had a relative density of 11.81.
Observation Some Aspergillus flavus isolates produced aflatoxin B1.
Observation A. flavus from B. diffusa produced the highest aflatoxin B1 content, 272.46 µg/kg.
Observation A. flavus from H. antidysenterica produced the least aflatoxin B1, 194.62 µg/kg.
Recommendation The authors recommend urgent quality control for fungal and mycotoxin contamination of herbal drugs.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bar1 was necessary for glucosylceramide production in Aspergillus nidulans.

Taxon: Aspergillus nidulansAspergillus nidulanse0
Gene: Bar1e0
Outcome: production of glucosylceramidese0

Verbatim

e0
“Bar1 is specifically necessary for the production of glucosylceramides in both F. graminearum and Aspergillus nidulans”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–909

Title

Control of Glucosylceramide Production and Morphogenesis by the Bar1 Ceramide Synthase in Fusarium graminearum

William R. Rittenour; Ming Chen; Edgar B. Cahoon; et al. PLoS ONE 2011. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019385

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation Fusarium ΔBAR1 mutants lacked a distinct sterol-rich domain at the hyphal tip.
Observation Fusarium ΔBAR1 mutants were nonpathogenic on wheat heads.
Observation Fusarium ΔBAR1 mutants had severely impaired in vitro growth.
Observation Fusarium ΔBAR1 mutants could not produce perithecia.
Observation Fusarium ΔBAR1 mutants produced macroconidia only with NaCl.
Observation Bar1 was necessary for glucosylceramide production in Fusarium graminearum.
Observation Fusarium ΔBAR1 mutants were resistant to heat-stable antifungal factor.
Observation A glucosylceramide synthase deficient Yarrowia mutant was resistant to HSAF.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fludioxonil somatic recombinogenic activity in diploid Aspergillus nidulans was similar to that of AHDF fungicides.

Taxon: Aspergillus nidulansAspergillus nidulanse1
Treatment: fludioxonile1
Outcome: somatic recombinogenic activitye1
Direction: similare1
Comparator: aromatic hydrocarbon and dicarboximide fungicides (AHDFs)e1

Verbatim

e1
“The somatic recombinogenic activity of the phenylpyrrole fungicide fludioxonil, in diploid Aspergillus nidulans was found similar to that caused by aromatic hydrocarbon and dicarboximide fungicides (AHDFs), such as iprodione, chlozolinate and tolclofos–methyl”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–259

Title

Phenylpyrrole Fungicides: Mitotic Instability in Aspergillus nidulans and Resistance in Botrytis cinerea

B. N. Ziogas; A. E. Kalamarakis Journal of Phytopathology 2001. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0434.2001.00617.x

Other claims from this paper (5)