Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 2.0 cm 3 /L foliar rate gave superior soybean seed quality against the other rates.

A claim from Effect of Spraying Foliar Amino Acids with Micronutrients on Seed Yield and Its Quality of Some Soybean Varieties Under Reclaimed Soil Conditions in Upper Egypt · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2.0 cm 3 /L foliar rate gave superior soybean seed quality against the other rates.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
foliar spraying of amino acids with micronutrients at a rate of 2.0 cm 3 /Le0
Outcome
seed qualitye0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
other ratese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spraying of amino acids with micronutrients at a rate of 2.0 cm 3 /L on soybean plants led to superior seed yield and its components, as well as seed quality, compared to the other rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1427

Title

Effect of Spraying Foliar Amino Acids with Micronutrients on Seed Yield and Its Quality of Some Soybean Varieties Under Reclaimed Soil Conditions in Upper Egypt

Mohamed Abo Elmaref Baheeg; Eman Ibrahim Abdel-Wahab; Hend Abou El-Fotouh Ghannam Asian Journal of Biological Sciences 2024. doi:10.3923/ajbs.2024.366.382

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e893fd2dd4556e6597d4801909638f64d147ab5420ce187a92a60720a3ff1935 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

micronutrient · quality: grain · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: grain · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.