Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed coating with Fe at 0.4 g/kg seed significantly increased crude protein and ash in pearl millet, compared with uncoated seeds.

A claim from EFFECT OF SEED COATING WITH SOME MICROELEMENTS ON THE YIELD QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF PEARL MILLET CROP · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed coating with Fe at 0.4 g/kg seed significantly increased crude protein and ash in pearl millet, compared with uncoated seeds.

Taxon
PEARL MILLETCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Fee0
Outcome
crude protein, ashe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
0.4 g/kg seed of all cutse0
Comparator
control treatmente1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEARL MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96
e0

“Plant height, seasonal fresh fodder, crude protein, ash and chlorophyll A and B were increased significantly with application of Zn, Mn and Fe at the rate of 0.4 g/kg seed of all cuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–689
e1

“control treatment (seeds without microelements)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–504

Title

EFFECT OF SEED COATING WITH SOME MICROELEMENTS ON THE YIELD QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF PEARL MILLET CROP

T. Abd El-Aziz,; A. Osman Journal of Plant Production 2000. doi:10.21608/jpp.2000.260234

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e64e7746de80bc0676e88c3044f892f19e57a707e221d688b920c63304462a9d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

iron atom · quality: protein · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.