Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Available N improved by 12.9% under the higher FYM rate compared with chemical fertilizers alone.

A claim from Potential for yield and soil fertility improvement with integration of organics in nutrient management for finger millet under rainfed Alfisols of Southern India · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available N improved by 12.9% under the higher FYM rate compared with chemical fertilizers alone.

Taxon
Finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
higher rate of FYM applicatione5
Outcome
available Ne5
Direction
improvede5
Value
12.9e5
Comparator
chemical fertilizers alonee5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Finger millet ( Eluesine coracana L.) is gaining importance as a food crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–74
e5

“The soil organic carbon, available N, P, K, and S improved by 25.0, 12.9, 5.7, 6.1, and 22.6%, respectively in the plots under higher rate of FYM application (8 Mg ha −1 ) compared to plots under chemical fertilizers alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–2018

Title

Potential for yield and soil fertility improvement with integration of organics in nutrient management for finger millet under rainfed Alfisols of Southern India

Mathyam Prabhakar; Kodigal A. Gopinath; Uppu Sai Sravan; et al. Frontiers in Nutrition 2023. doi:10.3389/fnut.2023.1095449

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e5191a2ecbbfb283485a3692a7e32949ccc98c365a14ee51909a8f51d8452d17 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.