Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At 120% ETc irrigation with 151 kg N ha-1, marketable bulb yield was 12.03 t ha-1.

A claim from Effects of irrigation and nitrogen levels on bulb yield, nitrogen uptake and water use efficiency of shallot (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Baker) · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120% ETc irrigation with 151 kg N ha-1, marketable bulb yield was 12.03 t ha-1.

Treatment
120% ETc and fertilized with either 105 or 151 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
marketablee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
12.03 t ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of water at 120% ETc and fertilized with either 105 or 151 kg N ha-1 was the best for maximum marketable (11.64 and 12.03 t ha-1) and total bulb yields (12.91 and 13.3 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1462
t0

“shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–108

Title

Effects of irrigation and nitrogen levels on bulb yield, nitrogen uptake and water use efficiency of shallot (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Baker)

Ousman Kemal Yenus African Journal of Agricultural Research 2013. doi:10.5897/ajar12013.6737

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e46b751b00a95fbb668e69d1ed8fc641488ca7375c3d04b251e0566a44936210 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.