Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No herbicide gave season-long weed control in chickpea.

A claim from Weed dynamics, crop growth and yield attributes of irrigated chickpea in response to chemical weed control · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No herbicide gave season-long weed control in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
herbicidee6
Outcome
season-long weed controle6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Efficacy of PRE herbicides was better than POST herbicides, especially in the plots of Desi chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–723
e6

“No herbicide provided season-long weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1124

Title

Weed dynamics, crop growth and yield attributes of irrigated chickpea in response to chemical weed control

Nouman Arshad; Amar Matloob; Mudassir Aziz; et al. International Journal of Pest Management 2021. doi:10.1080/09670874.2021.2015010

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e075dc4c433db5fa2ff3ef48b54d67502604cf8bf8374069949ae933659c2a95 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

herbicide · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 74 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 73 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Herbicide treatment A gave lower weed dry weight (11.3 g m-2) than other treatments in chickpea

    Integrated weed management in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under rainfed conditions of Karnataka, India · 2016 · compared with all other herbicidal treatments except two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAS

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.