Intervention effectmodel-written summary

B. subtilis weakly inhibited M. phaseolina growth in vitro.

A claim from BIOCONTROL OF MACHROPHOMINA PHASEOLINA BY Bacillus AND Pseudomanas cepacia ON SOYBEAN SEEDLINGS. · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis weakly inhibited M. phaseolina growth in vitro.

Taxon
SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
Treatment
B. subtilise0
Interactor
M. phaseolinae0pathogen
Second interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of M. phaseolinae0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis weakly inhibited the growth of M. phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–287
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85

Title

BIOCONTROL OF MACHROPHOMINA PHASEOLINA BY Bacillus AND Pseudomanas cepacia ON SOYBEAN SEEDLINGS.

Nadia El–Safwani,; Farial Hassanein; M. Rasmy Journal of Plant Production 2000. doi:10.21608/jpp.2000.259551

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e047f05bb2cdfe73b3ec91ec86e45141141392fabd89ae2d589236949803b56e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    B. subtilis Y2 had no effect on soybean seed germination and growth.

    Antagonistic mechanism and control effect of Bacillus subtilis Y2 against Fusarium oxysporum causing soybean root rot · 2013

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Water and B. subtilis empty-vector treatments showed no significant difference in nematode infection or plant growth.

    The Effects of Bacillus subtilis Expressing a Plant Elicitor Peptide on Nematode Infection on Soybean · 2024 · compared with water

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Bacillus subtilis alone significantly increased soybean height and biomass versus other treatments and control.

    Effects of Trichoderma harzianum and Bacillus subtilis on the root and soil microbiomes of the soybean plant INTACTA RR2 PRO™ · 2024 · compared with the other treatments and the control

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Bacillus subtilis inoculation increased soybean biomass in both assessment regions.

    Efficiency of inoculation by Bacillus subtilis on soybean biomass and productivity · 2018

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Combined Parachlorella and B. subtilis biopriming yielded high germination and normal seedlings.

    Seed biopriming with Parachlorella, Bacillus subtilis, and Trichoderma harzianum alleviates the effects of salinity in soybean · 2024

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Combined Trichoderma and Bacillus application maximized soybean growth traits.

    The Vegetative Growth Response of Detam Soybean Varieties towardsBacillus subtilisandTrichodermasp. Applications as Bio-fertilizer · 2021

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Dual inoculation of Bacillus subtilis and Bradyrhizobium japonicum with 75 % nitrogen and phosphorus was significantly superior to the other treatments in ameliorating soybean growth parameters.

    Effect of Dual Inoculation of Bacillus subtilis and Bradyrhizobium japonicum on Growth Parameters of Soybean (Glycine max L.) · 2018 · compared with rest of the treatment

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Combined exposure of NiO nanoparticles (50 mg kg-1) and B. subtilis increased soybean root length and shoot length by 19% to 26%.

    Co-exposure impact of nickel oxide nanomaterials and Bacillus subtilis on soybean growth and nitrogen assimilation dynamics · 2024

    Same direction

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.