Claim · model-written summary
Subsoiling did not affect nematode larval populations at the three depths.
- Taxon
- soybean, Glycine max
Glycine maxe1 - Treatment
- Subsoilinge0
- Interactor
- M. incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitat1pathogen - Outcome
- larval populationse0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Subsoiling did not affect larval populations at the three levels.”
e1“four soybean, Glycine max, cultivars”
t1“M. incognita”
Title
Interaction of four soybean cultivars with subsoiling and a nematicide.
N A Minton; M B Parker PubMed 1975
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Subsoiling increased soybean yields.
- Intervention effect DBCP application increased soybean yields.
- Intervention effect Combined subsoiling and DBCP increased yield more than either alone, though the effects were not additive.
- Intervention effect Subsoiling and DBCP increased yields of both Hutton and Davis cultivars.
- Intervention effect Subsoiling reduced root-knot galling in nonfumigated plots.
- Observation M. incognita larvae were most numerous at 0 to 20 cm and least numerous at 33 to 46 cm.