Claim · model-written summary
In the subsequent season, PRD reduced yield.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz
Vitis viniferat0 - Treatment
- PRDe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- reducee0
- Qualifier
- subsequent seasone0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In a subsequent season, PRD was found to reduce yield, primarily through a reduction in berryset.”
t0“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz”
Title
K.A. Bindon; P.R. Dry; B.R. Loveys South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture 2016. doi:10.21548/29-2-1438
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect At the end of an irrigation cycle, PRD reduced midday stomatal conductance and stem and leaf water potential relative to standard irrigation.
- Intervention effect Refilling both sides during cycle switching restored stomatal conductance and water potentials to control levels.
- Association Increasing node number reduced berry size and winter pruning weight.
- Association Increasing node number increased yield.
- Intervention effect In the first season, PRD had no significant effect on berry size, yield, or pruning weight.
- Intervention effect PRD reduced shoot length across all pruning treatments in the first season.
- Mechanism The subsequent season yield reduction under PRD was primarily attributed to reduced berry set.
- Association Water use efficiency increased significantly as crop load increased.
- Intervention effect PRD enhanced water use efficiency.