View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: winter rye ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Variety Kiprez showed a yield decrease of 31.1 % under soil acidity and was among the most tolerant varieties.
Qualifiermost tolerant to soil acidity e4 Verbatim
t0 “Results of the study of promising varieties of winter rye in the Kirov region ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 e4 “varieties ‘Kiprez’ and ‘Batist’ were the most tolerant to soil acidity; yield decrease was 31.1 % and 35.0 %, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1663 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Variety Batist showed a yield decrease of 35.0 % under soil acidity and was among the most tolerant varieties.
Qualifiermost tolerant to soil acidity e4 Verbatim
t0 “Results of the study of promising varieties of winter rye in the Kirov region ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 e4 “varieties ‘Kiprez’ and ‘Batist’ were the most tolerant to soil acidity; yield decrease was 31.1 % and 35.0 %, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1663 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield of all crops, including winter rye, has tended to decrease in recent years.
Outcomeyield of all crops e3 Verbatim
e3 “in recent years there has been a tendency to reduce the yield of all crops, including winter rye ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–821 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in winter rye yield in the region, shown by 11- and 22-year moving averages, is associated with the negative macronutrient balance.
Outcomeyield of winter rye e4 Qualifiermoving averages over 11 and 22 years e4 Verbatim
e4 “The noted decrease in the yield of winter rye in the region is recorded by its moving averages over 11 and 22 years, which is due to the negative balance of macroelements in agriculture during this period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1027 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Winter rye grain yield decrease d considerably in later generations.
Qualifierlater generations e0 Verbatim
e0 “Considerable yield decrease of winter rye grain took place in later generations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–259 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sunflower predecessor significantly reduced rye grain yield .
Treatmentafter sunflower e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sowing winter rye after sunflower significantly reduced morpho-physiological indicators of plants that resulted to decrease grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–471 t0 “winter rye (Secale cereale L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–79 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Continuous cropping reduced mean winter rye yield by 18% relative to crop rotation.
Treatmentcontinuous cropping e0 Comparatorcrop rotation e0 Verbatim
e0 “In continuous cropping mean yield of winter rye as compared to crop rotation a decrease for the 3-year period reached 18% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–594 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Without protection, monoculture rye yield fell 38%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter rye ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 e0 “rye yield decrease in the monoculture became lower with an intensification of the crop protection: 0-38%; H-20.5%; HF-19.9% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–804 e1 “O - no protection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–344 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
With weed protection, monoculture rye yield fell 20.5%.
Treatmentprotection against weeds e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter rye ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 e0 “rye yield decrease in the monoculture became lower with an intensification of the crop protection: 0-38%; H-20.5%; HF-19.9% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–804 e1 “H - protection against weeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–374 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
With weed and disease protection, monoculture rye yield fell 19.9%.
Treatmentprotection against weeds and diseases e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter rye ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 e0 “rye yield decrease in the monoculture became lower with an intensification of the crop protection: 0-38%; H-20.5%; HF-19.9% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–804 e1 “HF - protection against weeds and diseases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–418 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.