View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: sweetpotato ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Total yield declined in all cultivars after vine removal, with the sharpest decrease at 20%.
Qualifierall cultivars irrespective to maturity groups e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Told yield declined for all cultivars irrespective to maturity groups with the sharpest decrease being at the 20% VR ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1360 t0 “SWEETPOTATO (IPOMOEA BATATAS L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–92 t1 “SWEETPOTATO (IPOMOEA BATATAS L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–92 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield and root quality declined over successive adventitious propagation seasons.
Treatmentsuccessive seasons of adventitious propagation e0 Outcomeyield and storage root quality e0 Verbatim
e0 “decrease in yield and storage root quality with successive seasons of adventitious propagation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–1894 t0 “sweetpotato ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 20–31 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield and root quality declined over successive seasons of adventitious propagation.
Treatmentsuccessive seasons of adventitious propagation e0 Outcomeyield and storage root quality e0 Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in yield and storage root quality with successive seasons of adventitious propagation. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1798–1895 t0 “Sweetpotato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–31 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Marketable yield decrease d in all cultivars except TU-82-155.
Outcomemarketable yield e0 Qualifierexcept TU-82-155 e0 Verbatim
e0 “All cultivars except TU-82-155 showed a decrease in marketable yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1430 t0 “SWEETPOTATO (IPOMOEA BATATAS L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–92 t1 “SWEETPOTATO (IPOMOEA BATATAS L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–92 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield declined 0.6% per centimeter of weed growth in 2016.
InteractorPalmer amaranth e0 weed Verbatim
e0 “A 0.6% and 0.4% decrease in yield was observed for every centimeter of Palmer amaranth growth in 2016 and 2017, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–872 t0 “sweetpotato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–78 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield declined 0.4% per centimeter of weed growth in 2017.
InteractorPalmer amaranth e0 weed Verbatim
e0 “A 0.6% and 0.4% decrease in yield was observed for every centimeter of Palmer amaranth growth in 2016 and 2017, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–872 t0 “sweetpotato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–78 Other claims from this paper (7) Association author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The 2002 yield shortfall was most likely associated with greater monocot weed density and biomass and reduced sweetpotato vine biomass.
Outcomesweetpotato vine biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “was most likely due to an increase in monocot weed density and biomass concurrent with a decrease in sweetpotato vine biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1256 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At storage root development, most yield grades declined quadratically as 2,4-D rate increased.
Organ / stagestorage root development e0 Treatment2,4-D applied alone e0 Directionquadratic decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “quadratic decrease in crop yield (with respect to most yield grades) with increased rate of 2,4-D applied alone or in combination with glyphosate applied at storage root development ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1241 t0 “sweetpotato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect 2,4-D alone caused injury generally equal to or greater than glyphosate alone at equivalent rates. Intervention effect 2,4-D combined with glyphosate caused injury generally equal to or greater than glyphosate alone. Association At storage root development, injury rose quadratically with the rate of 2,4-D alone. Association At storage root development, injury rose quadratically with the combined herbicide rate. Association At storage root development, most yield grades declined quadratically as combined herbicide rate increased. Association At storage root formation, herbicide rate generally lacked the injury relationship seen at development. Association At storage root formation, herbicide rate generally lacked the yield relationship seen at development. Intervention effect The highest 1/10× rate of 2,4-D alone caused the greatest injury and yield reduction in general. Intervention effect The highest 1/10× rate of combined herbicides caused the greatest injury and yield reduction in general. Observation At storage root development, some lower 2,4-D rates also reduced U.S. no.1 and marketable yields. Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
U.S. number 1 yield rose as spacing decrease d from 15 to 7 inches.
Treatmentrow spacing decrease from 15 through 7 inches e0 OutcomeU.S. # 1’s yield e0 Value65-195 bushels per acre e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “U.S. # 1’s yield significantly increased with row spacing decrease from 15 through 7 inches, 65-195 bushels per acre ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–900 t0 “sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–80 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At storage root development, most yield grades declined quadratically as combined herbicide rate increased.
Organ / stagestorage root development e0 Treatment2,4-D applied alone or in combination with glyphosate e0 Directionquadratic decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “quadratic decrease in crop yield (with respect to most yield grades) with increased rate of 2,4-D applied alone or in combination with glyphosate applied at storage root development ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1241 t0 “sweetpotato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect 2,4-D alone caused injury generally equal to or greater than glyphosate alone at equivalent rates. Intervention effect 2,4-D combined with glyphosate caused injury generally equal to or greater than glyphosate alone. Association At storage root development, injury rose quadratically with the rate of 2,4-D alone. Association At storage root development, injury rose quadratically with the combined herbicide rate. Association At storage root development, most yield grades declined quadratically as 2,4-D rate increased. Association At storage root formation, herbicide rate generally lacked the injury relationship seen at development. Association At storage root formation, herbicide rate generally lacked the yield relationship seen at development. Intervention effect The highest 1/10× rate of 2,4-D alone caused the greatest injury and yield reduction in general. Intervention effect The highest 1/10× rate of combined herbicides caused the greatest injury and yield reduction in general. Observation At storage root development, some lower 2,4-D rates also reduced U.S. no.1 and marketable yields. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.