Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: sweet corn ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon changed husked yield from an 8% increase to an 18% decrease across rates, timings and seasons.

Taxon
sweet corne1
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
husked yielde0
Value
8% increase in yield to an 18% decreasee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Effects of ethephon on husked yield varied from an 8% increase in yield to an 18% decrease, depending on rate, timing, and season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–711
e1

“sweet corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–189

Title

Ethephon and Mechanical Topping Influence Growth, Yield, and Lodging of Sweet Corn

A.D. Bratsch; H.J. Mack HortScience 1990. doi:10.21273/hortsci.25.3.291

Other claims from this paper (8)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In one of three tests, seed germination percentage had a significant linear decrease relationship with U.S. Fancy ear yield.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Organ / stage
seede0
Outcome
yields of U.S. Fancy earse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
1 out of 3 testse0

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103
e0

“regression analysis showed in 1 out of 3 tests a significant linear decrease between seed germination percentages and yields of U.S. Fancy ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–708

Title

Effect of Compensated-rate Seeding and Seed Protectants on Yield and Quality of a Shrunken-2 Sweet Corn Hybrid

V. L. Guzman; E. A. Wolf; F. G. Martin HortScience 1983. doi:10.21273/hortsci.18.3.338

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:2 intercrop did not decrease sweet corn yield.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
intercropping of sweet corn+peanut with population proportion of 1:2e0
Outcome
sweet corn yielde0
Direction
without decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn+Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–55
e0

“intercropping of sweet corn+peanut with population proportion of 1:2 can suppress weed growth in on the 9th week (at harvest) without decreasing sweet corn yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–773

Title

Weeds Growth in Various Population of Sweet Corn+Peanut Intercropping

Dwi Ndaru Sekar Asih; Agus Nugroho Setiawan; Sarjiyah Sarjiyah Planta Tropika 2018. doi:10.18196/pt.2018.077.22-31

Other claims from this paper (1)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced sweet corn yield and yield attributes versus sole cropping.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
yield and yield attributese0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
sole cropping systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropping resulted decrease in yield and yield attributes of sweet corn comparing with sole cropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–645

Title

Productivity and Profitability of Sweet corn ( L. Zea mayssaccharata Sturt)-Based Intercropping Systems

Monika Menia; A Saad; A Aynehband; et al. Indian Journal of Ecology 2022. doi:10.55362/ije/2022/3583

Other claims from this paper (3)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With the 3.5-day irrigation interval, absolute sweet corn yield decreased more steeply with increasing salinity.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
3.5daye1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
steeper yield decreasee1

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn Response to Salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–66
e1

“showed a steeper yield decrease with increasing EC, for the 3.5day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–978

Title

Irrigation Interval as a Factor in Sweet Corn Response to Salinity1

J. Shalhevet; A. Vinten; A. Meiri Agronomy Journal 1986. doi:10.2134/agronj1986.00021962007800030031x

Other claims from this paper (5)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater main ear insertion height is associated with lower yield of ears without straw.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Organ / stage
earse0
Outcome
yield of ears without strawe0
Direction
decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in height and main ear insertion height result in a decrease in the percentage of commercial ears and yield of ears without straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–862
t0

“sweet corn genotypes1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–87

Title

Canonical correlation between vegetative and productive traits in sweet corn genotypes1

Eluana Domingues Gonçalves; Eloisa Borchardt de Araújo; Lucas Felipe Alves de Araújo; et al. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 2024. doi:10.1590/1983-40632024v5479943

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low planting density generally decreased ear yield per decare in all cultivars.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Low planting densitye0
Outcome
ear yield per decaree0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
all cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Low planting density generally resulted in a decrease in the ear yield per decare in all cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1325
t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt.) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–96

Title

Determination of Optimum Planting Densities in Sweet Corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt.) Cultivars Grown Under Greenhause Conditions

BOZKURT, Murat; KARADOĞAN, Tahsin DergiPark (Istanbul University) 2017

Other claims from this paper (10)
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At about 60% field capacity, nitrogen above about 180 might slightly reduce kernel yield.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
higher nitrogen fertilizer level than about 180e0
Outcome
kernel yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
around 60% FCe0

Verbatim

e0

“under a lower irrigation level (around 60% FC) higher nitrogen fertilizer level than about 180 might lead to slightly decrease in the kernel yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1269
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118

Title

Modeling and determining the best combination of nitrogen and irrigation levels for achieving high yield in sweet corn

Armin Saed-Moucheshi; Mohammad Pessarakli; Ali-akbar Mozafari; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2022. doi:10.1080/01904167.2022.2067063

Other claims from this paper (3)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency declined at 360 kg ha−1.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Outcome
N dosagee0
Direction
decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease was seen at 360 kg ha−1 N dosage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–974
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69

Title

Effect of Nitrogen on Yield and Some Quality Parameters of Sweet Corn

A. Oktem; A. Oktem; A. G. Oktem; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2010. doi:10.1080/00103621003592358

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ear number and weight per 10 ares tended to decrease at 7,500 plants per 10 ares.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
7,500 plants per 10 arese5
Outcome
Ear number and weight per 10 arese5
Direction
tended to decreasee5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A sweet corn hybrid. ‘Golden Elite 70’ was grown at four plant densities of 4.500, 5.500, 6,500 and 7,500 plants per 10 ares under early and ordinary season cultivations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–169
e5

“Ear number and weight per 10 ares increased as plant density increased up to 6,500 plants per 10 ares and tended to decrease at 7,500 plants per 10 ares”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–964

Title

Effects of plant density on growth and yield of sweet corn hybrid

S.U. Park; Ki Young Park; Hyeon Gui Moon; et al. The Korean Journal of Crop Science 1987

Other claims from this paper (11)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.