View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: sugarcane ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
OSIRI did not significantly decrease sugarcane yield compared with the control method.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “without a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1172 t0 “OSIRI : a decision-marking tool for irrigation of sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–74 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing seed rate did not decrease cane yield .
Treatmentreduction in seed rate e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cane yield did not decrease due to reduction in seed rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1214 t0 “sugarcane ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–106 t1 “sugarcane ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–106 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Post-harvest residues can decrease cane yield by 4.5-13.5 tlha.
TreatmentPost-harvest residues e0 Verbatim
e0 “Post-harvest residues can decrease cane yield by 4.5-13.5 tlha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–157 t0 “SUGARCANE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect simulated Claim · model-written summary
Different simulated yield - decrease patterns with the same average yield produced little change in profitability.
TreatmentDifferent simulated patterns of yield decrease between crops e1 Comparatorsame average yield e1 Verbatim
e0 “Sugarcane ( Saccharum sp. hyb.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 e1 “Different simulated patterns of yield decrease between crops with the same average yield effected little change in profitability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5266–5394 Other claims from this paper (10) Association author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude thermal time has a greater influence on yield decrease across harvest cycles.
Qualifierdifferent harvest cycles e0 Verbatim
e0 “thermal time has greater influence on yield decrease of sugarcane with different harvest cycles ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1349 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing tillage did not decrease cane and sugar yield .
TreatmentReduction of tillage operation e0 Outcomecane and sugar yield e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Reduction of tillage operation did not decrease the cane and sugar yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1484 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–104 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in sugarcane yield was much greater in some varieties than in others.
Outcomedecrease in yield e5 Verbatim
t0 “Residual effect of glyphosate as a ripener on sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–55 e5 “The decrease in yield in some varieties was much greater than in others ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–824 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease percentages between crops varied among Louisiana sugarcane varieties.
Outcomeyield decrease percentages between crops e1 Verbatim
e0 “Sugarcane ( Saccharum sp. hyb.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 e1 “Louisiana commercial sugarcane varieties evaluated in this study varied in their yield decrease percentages between crops, but much of the pattern differences could be attributed to a few varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4699–4896 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CoJ 64 showed the highest decrease in yield and juice quality attributes, confirming its sensitivity.
Outcomeyield and juice quality attributes e6 Qualifierconfirmed its sensitivity e6 Verbatim
t0 “Performance of sugarcane as ratoon crop under waterlogged conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 e6 “CoJ 64 genotype showed highest decrease in yield and juice quality attributes which confirmed its sensitivity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1433 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane yield was projected to decrease by up to 20% under late-century climate scenarios.
Outcomeyield of sugarcane e0 Qualifierdepending on the climate change scenario and location of the plot e0 Verbatim
e0 “the yield of sugarcane will decrease up to 20% depending on the climate change scenario and location of the plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1497 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.