Search claims · PlantClaims

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mogilev spring wheat had a climate-induced yield decrease of 17–30%.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: climate-inducede1
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 17–30 %e0
Setting: Mogilev regione0

Verbatim

e0
“In Mogilev region, this decrease was lower: spring wheat – 17–30 %, spring barley – 22–33 %, oats – 35–36 %.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–732

e1
“most of them were characterized by a climate-induced decrease in their yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–448

Title

INFLUENCE OF CLIMATE TRENDS ON DYNAMICS YIELD OF GRAIN CROPS IN MINSK AND MOGILEV REGIONS

V. V. Kalyada Nature Management 2022. doi:10.47612/2079-3928-2022-1-36-44

Other claims from this paper (13)

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodness of fit of relative yield decrease with mean CWSI was r 2 = 0.78 for the combined plantings.

Taxon: Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: relative Y decrease with mean CWSIe5
Value: r 2 = 0.78e5

Verbatim

t0
“Spring Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55

e5
“for relative Y decrease with mean CWSI, r 2 = 0.78”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1467

Title

Evapotranspiration and Yield Estimation of Spring Wheat from Canopy Temperature¹

R. A. Diaz; A. D. Matthias; R. J. Hanks Agronomy Journal 1983. doi:10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500050018x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Method / resource Goodness of fit of ET versus the temperature-stress-day index was large (r 2 at least 0.93).
Method / resource Goodness of fit of ET versus the stress-degree-day index was large (r 2 at least 0.86).
Method / resource Large r 2 values were obtained for yield versus the temperature-stress-day and stress-degree-day indices.
Method / resource For combined data from all plantings, r 2 for ET versus the stress-degree-day index was 0.90.
Method / resource For combined data from all plantings, r 2 for yield versus the temperature-stress-day index was 0.21.
Observation Slopes and intercepts of the individual regression lines were significantly different.
Method / resource Goodness of fit of relative ET deficit with mean CWSI was r 2 = 0.86 for the combined plantings.
Recommendation The authors recommend the stress-degree-day index as most suitable for wheat yield assessment and water management in northern Utah.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under optimal moisture, mixture yield did not decrease because spring wheat yield increased.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome: total yield of the mixturee0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Qualifier: With optimal moisturee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“With optimal moisture, they reduced the yield of the vetch sowing, but the total yield of the mixture did not decrease due to the increase in the yield of spring wheat.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–342

Title

INFLUENCE OF MOISTURE CONDITIONS AND NITROGEN FERTILIZERS ON THE YIELD STRUCTURE AND YIELD OF THE VETCH-WHEAT MIXTURE COMPONENTS IN THE SOD-PODZOLIC SANDY LOAM SOIL OF THE KALUGA REGION

Timirâzevskaâ selʹskohozâjstvennaâ akademiâ; V.K. Khramoy; A. A. Kirichenko International Scientific Conference 2021. doi:10.26897/978-5-9675-1855-3-2021-58

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Under moisture deficit, nitrogen fertilizers had no significant effect on sowing vetch yield.
Intervention effect Under moisture deficit, nitrogen fertilizers increased mixture yield through spring wheat.
Intervention effect Under optimal moisture, nitrogen fertilizers reduced vetch yield.
Intervention effect Under optimal moisture, nitrogen fertilizers increased spring wheat yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not decrease significantly until more than 60 cm of plot area was removed.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: more than 60 cm (12.5%) of plot area was removede0
Outcome: yield of the genotypese0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 60 cm (12.5%)e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Generally, no significant decrease in yield of the genotypes was detected until more than 60 cm (12.5%) of plot area was removed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–544

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50

Title

Yield Adjustment for Missing Units in Spring Wheat¹

Robert H. Busch; Yusuf Ergun Crop Science 1973. doi:10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183x001300010044x

Other claims from this paper (3)

Association Mean yield reduction per missing unit was about 4.55%.
Association Yield reduction per missing unit ranged from 3.7 to 5.0% across genotypes and years.
Method / resource Yield adjustments using the mean reduction were satisfactory after more than two missing units.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minsk spring wheat had a climate-induced yield decrease of 30–39% of actual increase.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: climate-inducede1
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 30–39 %e0
Setting: Minsk regione0

Verbatim

e0
“in early spring crops in Minsk region: spring wheat – 30–39 %, spring barley – 55–62, oats – 48–72 % of the actual increase.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–623

e1
“most of them were characterized by a climate-induced decrease in their yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–448

Title

INFLUENCE OF CLIMATE TRENDS ON DYNAMICS YIELD OF GRAIN CROPS IN MINSK AND MOGILEV REGIONS

V. V. Kalyada Nature Management 2022. doi:10.47612/2079-3928-2022-1-36-44

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing mineral nitrogen with nano chelate micro fertilisers (N40 + NCMF) gave the highest reliable yield, 3.97 t/ha, a 16.7% yield decrease relative to control 2.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: N40 + NCMFe1
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 16.7%e1
Qualifier: the highest reliable yield reached 3.97 t/hae1
Comparator: control 2e1

Verbatim

t0
“nano chelates for spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–90

e1
“the highest reliable yield reached 3.97 t/ha in the N40 + NCMF treatment with a 16.7% decrease in yield relative to control 2”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1305

Title

Efficiency of partial replacement of macro fertilisers with nano chelates for spring wheat

S. M. Kalenska; N. V. Novytska; V. V. Melnychenko; et al. Scientific Papers of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet 2024. doi:10.47414/np.32.2024.314608

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waste organic materials dosed to plant nutrient needs did not decrease yield biological value.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Fertilization with waste organic materials, in doses based on plant requirements for nutrientse0
Outcome: biological value of yielde0
Direction: did not lead to a decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Fertilization with waste organic materials, in doses based on plant requirements for nutrients, did not lead to a decrease in the biological value of yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–893

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–59

Title

Yield and selected indices of grain quality in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) depending on fertilization

Krzysztof Gondek Journal of Elementology 2014. doi:10.5601/jelem.2014.19.1.592

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing pre-winter ploughing with heavy harrowing gave a statistically insignificant spring wheat yield decrease of 7.1%.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume2
Material: cultivar Heliae2
Treatment: heavy harrowinge1
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 7.1 %e1
Comparator: pre-winter ploughinge1

Verbatim

e1
“replacing pre-winter ploughing with cultivatoring (B) or heavy harrowing (C) resulted in a statistically insignificant yield decrease, by 4.3 % and 7.1 % respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1311

e2
“Autumn tillage under spring wheat, cultivar Helia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–693

Title

Response of spring wheat to reduced tillage systems and to different levels of mineral fertilization

Małgorzata Haliniarz; K. Bujak; Dorota Gawęda; et al. http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-f506ec77-cbaf-41cd-a309-895b1494215a/c/12_3_2013_2.pdf 2013

Other claims from this paper (1)

Intervention effect Replacing pre-winter ploughing with cultivatoring gave a statistically insignificant spring wheat yield decrease of 4.3%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing wheat row spacing from 12 to 24 cm did not decrease wheat yield.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: Increasing the row space of spring wheat from 12 to 24 cme0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: didn´t decreasee0
Qualifier: maintaining the same seeding densitye0
Comparator: 12e0

Verbatim

e0
“Increasing the row space of spring wheat from 12 to 24 cm, but maintaining the same seeding density, didn´t decrease its yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126

Title

Row spacing and catch crop establishment in organic arable systems: a way to increase biological N fixation

Chiara De Notaris; Peter Sørensen; Jim Rasmussen; et al. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) 2016

Other claims from this paper (1)

Intervention effect Wider wheat rows positively influenced growth of the undersown catch crop.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Spring wheat yield is projected to decrease 10.3 ± 3.2% in 2050–2059.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome: yield of spring wheate0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 10.3 ± 3.2%e0
Qualifier: 2050–2059e0
Comparator: yield at the end of XX centurye0

Verbatim

e0
“future decrease in the yield of spring wheat by 9.1 ± 2.3% (2030–2039), 10.3 ± 3.2% (2050–2059), and 18.9 ± 2.8% (2090–2099) as compared with the yield at the end of XX century”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–564

Title

Future changes in spring wheat yield in the European Russia as inferred from a large ensemble of high-resolution climate projections

Vera Pavlova; Igor Shkolnik; Anastasia Pikaleva; et al. Environmental Research Letters 2018. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aaf8be

Other claims from this paper (7)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics