View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: potatoes ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The liquid spray did not significantly decrease potato yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Alternative protection of potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34 e3 “The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans ) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 20% irrigation reduction decrease d yield to 53.1 t/ha, a 9.7% decrease .
Treatmentdecrease in the irrigation rate by 20 % in option 3 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in the irrigation rate by 20 % in option 3 and by 40 % in option 4 led to a decrease in yield to 53.1 and 43.7 t/ha, respectively, but when the irrigation rate decrease s by 20 % in option 3, the yield decrease s only 9.7 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1817 e1 “spring planted potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–150 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Potato yield increase was correlated with a decrease in foliar late blight severity.
Outcomeyield increasing e0 Qualifierdecreasing of foliar late blight disease severity e0 Not reported Interactor Treatment Comparator Setting
Verbatim
e0 “yield increasing was correlated with decreasing of foliar late blight disease severity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1065 t0 “Potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–117 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Outside those timing windows, yield decrease d by at least 5%.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Otherwise, yield decrease was 5% or greater. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1123 t0 “Potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 40% irrigation reduction decrease d productivity to 43.7 t/ha, a 25.6% decrease .
Treatmentdecrease in irrigation rate by 40 % e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “by 40 % in option 4 led to a decrease in yield to 53.1 and 43.7 t/ha, respectively, but when the irrigation rate decrease s by 20 % in option 3, the yield decrease s only 9.7 %, and a decrease in irrigation rate by 40 % leads to a decrease in productivity by 25.6 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1906 e1 “spring planted potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–150 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The comprehensive effect significantly decrease d potato yield share.
Not reported Setting
Verbatim
e0 “significant decrease in proportions of beans yield and potatoes yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1341 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Omitting potassium significantly decrease d potato yield in 1952.
Treatmentelimination of potassium e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In 1952 the elimination of potassium did cause a significant decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1007 t0 “Potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–45 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Potato yield decrease d significantly as aphid populations increased at Kabete.
Verbatim
t0 “potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–61 e0 “there was a significant decrease in yield with increase in aphid populations at the Kabete site ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1019 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The liquid spray did not significantly decrease late blight occurrence on potatoes.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Alternative protection of potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34 e3 “The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans ) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Ecological growing decrease d potato yield by 36%.
Treatmentecological way of growing e0 Comparatorconventional way e2 Verbatim
e0 “The ecological way of growing had markedly negative effect on the yield ( decrease by 36%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–545 e1 “consumer potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–124 e2 “in comparison with conventional way ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–161 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.